[vtk-developers] Valgrind defects are zero!

[David Partyka]

Geeze 10 hours? That machine is also a P4 pos from 2006.

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:38 PM, David Cole <david.cole at kitware.com> wrote:

> We can do way better than guess, since we have access to the machine.
> Analyze the log file time stamps left in Testing/Temporary:
>
>  kitware at amber2:~/Dashboards/MyTests/VTK-valgrind/Testing/Temporary$
> ls -lart *.log
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 kitware kitware       0 2011-12-07 23:12 LastStart.log
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 kitware kitware    1499 2011-12-07 23:12
> LastUpdate_20111208-0100.log
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 kitware kitware   28792 2011-12-07 23:13
> LastConfigure_20111208-0100.log
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 kitware kitware  846656 2011-12-07 23:49
> LastBuild_20111208-0100.log
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 kitware kitware 4475923 2011-12-08 00:11
> LastTest_20111208-0100.log
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 kitware kitware      85 2011-12-08 10:49
> LastTestsFailed_20111208-0100.log
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 kitware kitware 4627135 2011-12-08 10:49
> LastDynamicAnalysis_20111208-0100.log
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 kitware kitware     284 2011-12-08 10:49
> LastSubmit_20111208-0100.log
>
> LastTest_20111208-0100.log was last modified at 11 minutes after
> midnight (00:11)
> LastDynamicAnalysis_20111208-0100.log was last modified at 10:49 this
> morning.
>
> Unless my math is wrong, or somebody re-ran just the valgrind portion
> by hand this morning, the dynamic analysis run on this machine took 10
> hours and 38 minutes today.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Dave C.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, David Partyka <david.partyka at kitware.com>
> wrote:
> > I would guesstimate an hour or two to run all ~1000ish tests on modern
> > hardware. It takes a while to get the supression file straightened out,
> it
> > will take several submission iterations just so you know what you're
> getting
> > yourself into.
> >
> > There aren't that many valgrind submissions because we don't have many
> linux
> > machines with GPUs. We do have two new machines that I would like to
> create
> > valgrind dashboards on but it hasn't trickeld up in priority for me yet
> :-/
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:12:22 -0500, David Cole said:
> >>
> >> >All fine suggestions in theory, but running a valgrind dashboard on
> >> >every single gerrit topic will be quite time consuming.
> >>
> >> Indeed.  And AFAICT, there is only *1* build machine running valgrind.
> >>  Would be nice to have some redundancy there.  We have a mostly-idle
> machine
> >> that could (maybe) do this nightly.
> >>
> >> cdash's 'Dynamic Analysis' section doesn't seem to discuss runtime....
> >> about how long does it take to run all VTK tests in valgrind?  (our
> machine
> >> in question is an i7.)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> --
> >> ____________________________________________________________
> >> Sean McBride, B. Eng                 sean at rogue-research.com
> >> Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
> >> Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Powered by www.kitware.com
> >>
> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >>
> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20111208/8bee85bd/attachment.html>