[vtk-developers] [Paraview-developers] Moving vtkMemberFunctionCommand to VTK

[David Gobbi]

Having a templated public class method seems to be essential in
order for this to work.  I'd vote for having it committed as-is.
This is adding a feature that is already taken for granted in the
wrapper languages, kind of like vtkSmartPointer.

  David

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
<utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> Cool. There is some implementation nuances that need to be ironed out
> (template visibility etc. etc.). Once I have it figured out, I'll
> commit it.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:42 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Nice, it hides the vtkCommand mechanism and makes AddObserver()
>> much easier to use.  In fact this makes AddObserver() work the same
>> as it does in the wrapper languages.  It looks like the right thing to do.
>>
>>  David
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit
>> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Attached is an possible implementation for the same.
>>>
>>> Any comments?
>>>
>>> Utkarsh
>>
>