[vtk-developers] VTK moving to Git

[Michael Halle]

Does Gitorious' AGPL license matter for the purpose you describe?

http://gitorious.org/about

I was actually surprised to see that git didn't have a good non-cygwin 
windows port:

http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/

Have you found this limitation significant during Kitware development?

Thanks.

--Mike



On 3/22/10 9:38 AM, Berk Geveci wrote:
> Yes it was. The killing blow for Mercurial was the fact that there is
> nothing like Gitorious (I mean the software not the service) for it.
> We would like to setup Gitorious here and modify it  so that we can
> include it in our software development process.
>
> -berk
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Charl Botha<c.p.botha at tudelft.nl>  wrote:
>> On 22 March 2010 01:23, Berk Geveci<berk.geveci at kitware.com>  wrote:
>>> It shouldn't be a problem to keep github around. At least until we
>>> have our own gitorious running.
>>
>> <asbestos anti-flame suit on>
>>
>> Was mercurial also considered as DVCS alternative? Certain unnamed
>> companies who tend to do their research chose mercurial over git:
>> http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>