[vtk-developers] Proposed change to vtkSocket.cxx

[Moreland, Kenneth]

> Good catch.  However, I don't think there needs to be a limited attempt
> count or a usleep to yield.  It can just try again immediately.  This is
> a common idiom on posix system calls.

That makes sense.  There already exists a similar limited attempt count and sleep for Windows.  Is this also unnecessary, or are the circumstances sufficiently different for the WSAENOBUFS failure?

-Ken