[vtk-developers] Can I move the socket classes to "common"?

[David Gobbi]

Thanks for the reply.  I'll do the move, then.  This is important not
only for my own code, but also for the new OpenIGTLink code that is
being added to Slicer3.

   David



On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
<utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> That sounds fine to me. I put them in Parallel only because the socket
> communicator was there.
>
>  Utkarsh
>
>  David Gobbi wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > I have found myself using the vtkSocket classes for things completely
> > separate from parallel processing.  Would there be any objections to
> > moving these classes into the Common directory so that they are part
> > of the default VTK build?  The specific classes are:
> >
> > vtkSocket
> > vtkClientSocket
> > vtkServerSocket
> >
> > Surely people will agree that these classes provide very
> > general-purpose, low-level functionality.
> >
> >   David
> > _______________________________________________
> > vtk-developers mailing list
> > vtk-developers at vtk.org
> > http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> >
> >
>