[vtk-developers] Removed windows.h from VTK headers.
Brad King
brad.king at kitware.com
Fri Dec 17 09:35:12 EST 2004
John Biddiscombe (CSCS) wrote:
>> If VTK does not include windows.h everywhere then there is no place to
>> do this undef. User code can still include a VTK header and then
>> afterwards include windows.h. Then their call to GetClassName will
>> break.
>
> OK. I give in. You've clearly given this more thought than I. Here's my
> last go...I shared Sebastien's horror at the sight of the PropInternal
> stuff, why not simply put the same #defines that used to be in windows.h
> into setget.h, that way everything will be exacly the same as before and
> if windows.h is included it'll just be a second definition of the same
> thing. No RemovePropInternal and associated stuff? (SetGet or
> WindowsNameMangling.h can have #ifdef unicode etc etc and mimic the old
> mangling)
This solution still forces the mangling upon user code. Not all VTK
applications include a VTK header in every source file. If the user
code has any methods that have this mangling problem then including a
VTK header will mangle it. This will cause linker errors in the user
code just because they included a VTK header.
I've documented the motivation and implementation of these changes here:
VTK/Utilities/Upgrading/README.WindowsMangling.txt
-Brad
More information about the vtk-developers
mailing list