[vtk-developers] (Another) bug in MS Visual Studio

[Andy Cedilnik]

On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 22:52, Lisa Sobierajski Avila wrote:
> Actually, if you said 1 you are right - because you have your test 
> backwards! :-)

What do you mean my test is backwards?
It will return 1 (fail) on broken compilers.

> I think the problem is that string literals are of type char * even though 
> they can't be modified....

Well that does not make sense does it?
If you cannot modify it, then it is (should be) const char*.

			Andy