[vtk-developers] (Another) bug in MS Visual Studio
andy.cedilnik at kitware.com
Thu May 30 09:33:03 EDT 2002
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 22:52, Lisa Sobierajski Avila wrote:
> Actually, if you said 1 you are right - because you have your test
> backwards! :-)
What do you mean my test is backwards?
It will return 1 (fail) on broken compilers.
> I think the problem is that string literals are of type char * even though
> they can't be modified....
Well that does not make sense does it?
If you cannot modify it, then it is (should be) const char*.
More information about the vtk-developers