[vtk-developers] VTK/Python and Sun new discoveries

Andy Cedilnik andy.cedilnik at kitware.com
Fri May 24 11:39:48 EDT 2002


I will commit what I have, then you or whoever can try to get it to load
libvtkCommon ...

			Andy

On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 11:18, David Gobbi wrote:
> I agree that including a vtkpython binary (I much prefer calling
> it 'vtkpython' rather than 'vtkPython') is a good idea.  It is
> trivial to do and it solves a lot of problems.  For the SGI I
> have to re-link the python executable with the C++ compiler
> to make it work, I'm not terribly surprised that it is the
> same under Solaris.

> Perhaps the 'vtkpython' executable could also automatically load
> libvtkCommonPython et al as well?

> 
> And when VTK/python is built, both VTK and python should definitely
> be built shared.  Otherwise it is guaranteed that the
> vtkTkRenderWidget will not work, since when static linking is used
> both VTK and Python will each have their own copy of the Tk code
> and the Tk/Tcl global variables.
> 
> There are ways of building VTK/python static, for example by
> linking the vtkTkRenderWidget.so against the _tkinter.so module
> that comes with python instead of linking it against libtk.so.
> But unless someone wants to work through all the details, add them
> to the cmake files, and maintain them it is better just to tell
> everyone to build shared.  This is going to be a problem with
> python and ITK, since there is no 'shared' option with ITK.
> 
> Prabhu is correct that I am busy right now, I'm reading the list
> and recompiling VTK every so often to make sure that all my stuff
> works with the cvs version of VTK, but I probably won't be
> committing much of anything in the next few months.
> 
>  - David
> 
> 
> 
> On 24 May 2002, Andy Cedilnik wrote:
> 
> > Prabhu,
> >
> > I agree with you. I wish we could use python executable for vtk/python
> > and tclsh (or wish) for vtk/tcl. Unfortunately that will not work on Sun
> > using Sun's compiler and probably on HP,SGI,.... Please correct me if I
> > am wrong. The problem is that C++ code does not get initialized
> > correctly when the binary is compiled using C compiler and not C++ one.
> >
> > As a test, please try this code:
> > from vtk.tk.vtkTkRenderWidget import *
> > root = Tk()
> > pane = vtkTkRenderWidget(root)
> >
> > This will crash on all platforms where classes do not get initialized
> > properly. The funny thing is that all VTK python tests will pass. This
> > however is not the case with gcc, which does not have any problem with
> > this.
> >
> > So, I think we should add vtkPython, which is just a wrapper around the
> > actual python library and does not include any code at all.
> >
> > 				Andy
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 10:37, Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
> > > Well, I am not sure that this is the right way to go.  Making a new
> > > binary seems unnecessary.  Also I dont understand clearly what the
> > > issues are with the current setup and why you need to add a special
> > > vtkPython binary.  Maybe you could explain it a little more?  I
> > > understand that if you want specific features like initializing MPI or
> > > something like that you'd need a special interpreter but doing it just
> > > for VTK is a no-no IMHO.
> > >
> > > I dont know what David has to say.  I guess he is very busy these
> > > days.
> > >
> > >     AC> Note to python developers: Please add some tests to vtk that
> > >     AC> will use tk render widget.
> > >
> > > I'll keep that in mind when I get some time to do the test stuff.  The
> > > trouble is that I'm not too familiar with how the testing exactly
> > > works and don't have too much time to check it out either.
> > >
> > > prabhu
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > vtk-developers mailing list
> > > vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
> > > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > vtk-developers mailing list
> > vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> >
> 





More information about the vtk-developers mailing list