[vtk-developers] ImagePermute and ImageReslice

[David Gobbi]

Hi Charles,

You're definitely right that vtkImageReslice makes for an ugly
superclass.  Sizewise, vtkImageReslice is pretty nasty.  How about
if a base class was broken off from vtkImageReslice that
contained just the flip/permute/resample engine?  This would
also help to clean up vtkImageReslice a bit.

 - David

--
  David Gobbi, MSc                       dgobbi at irus.rri.ca
  Advanced Imaging Research Group
  Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario



On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Charles Law wrote:

> I am a little late responding here, but ...
>
> I disagree.  I would rather have simple super classes at the expense of
> having some extra code.
>
> vtkImagePermute in particular was a very simple class.
>
> vtkImagePermute.cxx:            211 lines
> vtkImageResample.cxx:   779 lines
> vtkImageReslice.cxx             3515 lines
>
>
> Also, it would be confusing to have vtkImageReslice as a superclass to
> vtkImagePermute, vtkImageFlip, and others.
>
>
>
> Charles.
>
>
> At 05:12 PM 6/15/2002 -0400, Bill Lorensen wrote:
> >David,
> >
> >http://public.kitware.com/VTK/Testing/Sites/amber1.kitware/Linux-2.2.17-21mdksmp-c++/20020615-2013-Continuous/Update.html
> >
> >Nice job. Anytime we can remove code and retain functionality is a plus.
> >
> >You mentioned ImageFlip and others. Do you have plans for these too? Do
> >you need help?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Bill
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >vtk-developers mailing list
> >vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
> >http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> vtk-developers mailing list
> vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>