[vtk-developers] vtk constructor changes

[Lorensen, William E (CRD)]

We tried over the years to keep Set's out of the constructors. The otherPrint test should be finding
them.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastien BARRE [mailto:sebastien.barre at kitware.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Lorensen, William E (CRD)
Cc: 'berk.geveci at kitware.com'; vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] vtk constructor changes


At 1/10/2002 08:59 AM, Lorensen, William E (CRD) wrote:
>Berk,
>The changes you are making to some constructors that replace explicit 
>initializations with Set's will
>calls purify umr/umc's. That's because the macros compare the current 
>setting (which is not
>initialized) with the new values.

Sorry, these are mine, I'm fixing that right now.

BTW, I found several classes using ->Set... in the constructor, might be 
worth cleaning them too.



--
Sebastien Barre