[vtk-developers] vtk constructor changes
Lorensen, William E (CRD)
lorensen at crd.ge.com
Thu Jan 10 09:27:29 EST 2002
We tried over the years to keep Set's out of the constructors. The otherPrint test should be finding
From: Sebastien BARRE [mailto:sebastien.barre at kitware.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Lorensen, William E (CRD)
Cc: 'berk.geveci at kitware.com'; vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] vtk constructor changes
At 1/10/2002 08:59 AM, Lorensen, William E (CRD) wrote:
>The changes you are making to some constructors that replace explicit
>initializations with Set's will
>calls purify umr/umc's. That's because the macros compare the current
>setting (which is not
>initialized) with the new values.
Sorry, these are mine, I'm fixing that right now.
BTW, I found several classes using ->Set... in the constructor, might be
worth cleaning them too.
More information about the vtk-developers