[vtk-developers] RE: [new tree] what happened to vtkImplicitModeller :)

William A. Hoffman bill.hoffman at kitware.com
Fri Jun 22 17:25:42 EDT 2001

I am not sure this path is a good one.   It encourages people to keep files 
in the vtk tree that
are not under cvs.   I find that hard to maintain.   I guess it is ok for a 
single persons use, but
these files would not be easy to share with others.


At 10:09 PM 6/22/2001 +0200, Sebastien BARRE wrote:
>At 22/06/2001 14:35, John Biddiscombe wrote:
>>>Sorry John, I'm just wondering why you put that line in all CMakeLists 
>>>files, and not in a single place, i.e. vtkCMakeOptions.cmake ? Do you 
>>>want to customize at a package level ? I do not remember if 
>>>LocalUserOptions.cmake is searched in the current directory, or also in 
>>>${HOME} or something..
>>Yes. I wanted to put something like this in each directory,
>I guess we could also include in in vtkCMakeOptions.cmake, so that a 
>global LocalUserOptions.cmake could be used (factorizing stuff that would 
>be in the package's LocalUserOptions.cmake) ?
>vtk-developers mailing list
>vtk-developers at public.kitware.com

More information about the vtk-developers mailing list