[vtk-developers] RE: [new tree] what happened to vtkImplicitModeller :)
William A. Hoffman
bill.hoffman at kitware.com
Fri Jun 22 17:25:42 EDT 2001
I am not sure this path is a good one. It encourages people to keep files
in the vtk tree that
are not under cvs. I find that hard to maintain. I guess it is ok for a
single persons use, but
these files would not be easy to share with others.
-Bill
At 10:09 PM 6/22/2001 +0200, Sebastien BARRE wrote:
>At 22/06/2001 14:35, John Biddiscombe wrote:
>
>>>Sorry John, I'm just wondering why you put that line in all CMakeLists
>>>files, and not in a single place, i.e. vtkCMakeOptions.cmake ? Do you
>>>want to customize at a package level ? I do not remember if
>>>LocalUserOptions.cmake is searched in the current directory, or also in
>>>${HOME} or something..
>>
>>Yes. I wanted to put something like this in each directory,
>
>I guess we could also include in in vtkCMakeOptions.cmake, so that a
>global LocalUserOptions.cmake could be used (factorizing stuff that would
>be in the package's LocalUserOptions.cmake) ?
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>vtk-developers mailing list
>vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
More information about the vtk-developers
mailing list