[vtk-developers] abstract/concrete etc

[David Gobbi]

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, John Biddiscombe wrote:

> >Anyway, I'm getting philosophical here at your expense (and perhaps
> >I'm trying the patience of others on this mailing list).  My only
> >problem with the change is that it will require me to rewrite some
> >of my code, and all I ask is that you give me some time to think
> >up an alternative way to write my own code such that I no longer
> >need to create bare naked vtkObjects.
> 
> Apologies. I misread your email and didn't quite realize you were creating 
> vtkObjects as timestampers. This is (I suppose) a legit use of an otherwise 
> abstract class. Damn.

Well, not entirely legitimate... the only reason I did it was that 
vtkTimeStamp isn't wrapped.  The solution is to add the necessary
code so that vtkTimeStamp is wrapped.  I'll get to work on it.

 - David

--
  David Gobbi, MSc                    dgobbi at irus.rri.on.ca
  Advanced Imaging Research Group
  Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario