[Smtk-developers] git-lfs test repository

Haocheng Liu haocheng.liu at kitware.com
Tue Jul 25 13:24:19 EDT 2017


Using  *git lfs clone* with git-lfs 2.2.1+ git 2.13, it takes me about 1
minute to download the data. With simple *git clone*, it feels like taking
forever...

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:09:27 -0400, David Thompson wrote:
> > The previous version (only 1 file used git-lfs) cloned in 8 minutes. I
> > am over 32 minutes into cloning the new version and barely half-way
> > through (by total size). Even if newer versions of git/git-lfs are
> > faster (I am using the macos-provided 2.11.0 and homebrew git-lfs
> > 1.5.3), will it be enough?
>
> OK, this seems like a KHQ/KRS difference, nothing inherent. It cloned
> here in seconds (separate clone/fetch steps for the LFS data took ~30
> seconds).
>
> Versions I'm using:
>
>     git 2.9.4
>     git-lfs 1.5.5
>
> Starting with 2.11.0, git can run filters through a single process
> (rather than a new process per filtered path).
>
> Note that there is also `git lfs clone` which defers content download
> until after the non-LFS data is downloaded. What's the performance of
> that? How about a clone without LFS at all and then followed by:
>
>     git lfs fetch
>     git lfs checkout
>
> ?
>
> --Ben
> _______________________________________________
> Smtk-developers mailing list
> Smtk-developers at smtk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/smtk-developers
>



-- 
Best regards
Haocheng

Haocheng LIU
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/smtk-developers/attachments/20170725/640c6770/attachment.html>


More information about the Smtk-developers mailing list