[Smtk-developers] SMTK's CMB plugins
Robert Michael O'Bara
bob.obara at kitware.com
Wed Jan 27 11:55:53 EST 2016
I vote for #3 - it doesn’t sound like its a ton of work.
Bob
Robert M. O'Bara, MEng.
Assistant Director of Scientific Computing
Kitware Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Suite 101
Clifton Park, NY 12065
Phone: (518) 881- 4931
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 11:34 AMEST, Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> So there's a problem with SMTK building CMB plugins, particularly on OS
> X. Plugins need to be installed in each .app bundle, but SMTK doesn't
> know what applications are going to be built. Here are three possible
> solutions:
>
> - move knowledge of applications to CMB's top-level so that SMTK can
> know where to install its bits to.
> Cons:
> CMB now has options at the wrong scope.
> SMTK has intimate knowledge of CMB.
> CMB with external SMTK is likely not going to work.
> Pros:
> smallest change
>
> - CMB does install(FILE) to install SMTK's plugins.
> Cons:
> Build tree won't work anymore (install_name_dir won't be fixed
> up with install(FILE)).
> Pros:
> No SMTK change.
>
> - Move CMB plugins into CMB itself.
> Cons:
> Most work.
> SMTK now has a bit of a split-brain for its plugins.
> Pros:
> CMB can do what it needs with the plugins for every platform.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Ben
> _______________________________________________
> Smtk-developers mailing list
> Smtk-developers at smtk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/smtk-developers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/smtk-developers/attachments/20160127/b95dde3d/attachment.html>
More information about the Smtk-developers
mailing list