<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Simon,</p>
<p>thank you for testing my dataset.</p>
<p>I get the same results you describe and I am quite happy with the
first result. However, the reconstructed volume is a "mirror" view
of the real object, and my guess was that the rotating plate was
going in the opposite direction assumed by rtk. Is it the wrong
assumption? <br>
</p>
<p>Thank you again for your help,</p>
<p>best regards,</p>
<p>Vincent<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div>Thanks for the dataset. When I run</div>
<div><span style="font-family:monospace"> rtkfdk -p . -r ^proj.mha$
-g direct.xml --spacing 0.5 -d 300 --hardware cuda -o fdk.mha</span></div>
<div>The result looks good to me. Obviously, when I run</div>
<div><span style="font-family:monospace"> rtkfdk -p . -r ^proj.mha$
-g inverse.xml --spacing 0.5 -d 300 --hardware cuda -o fdk.mha</span></div>
<div>the result is bad since the correct rotation direction seems to
be the direct one. Did you expect the second line to produce the
correct result? Or is the first line not producing a good enough
result in your opinion?</div>
</body>
</html>