[Rtk-users] JosephForwardProjectionImageFilter - output intensity problem
Simon Rit
simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
Fri Aug 13 01:59:10 EDT 2021
Hi,
I'm not sure but one thing is that after reconstruction, you should mask
out everything which is out of the field of view. This can be done with the
FieldOfViewImageFilter
<http://www.openrtk.org/Doxygen/classrtk_1_1FieldOfViewImageFilter.html> to
which you should pass the reconstructed image as first input, the
ProjectionsStack and the Geometry.
If this is not the issue, I would check that you have reconstructed the
whole field of view, that your projections do not have any truncation issue.
Simon
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:55 PM Thibault Pelletier via Rtk-users <
rtk-users at public.kitware.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm currently implementing the NMAR algorithm using RTK and I have a
> problem regarding the forward projection step.
>
> To make sure my building blocks are correct, I decided to first read my
> projection stack using the rtk::ProjectionsReader class, do a FDK Cone Beam
> reconstruction and forward project this reconstructed image using the
> rtk::JosephForwardProjectionImageFilter class.
>
> I then compare the images that I have after reading my projection stack
> with the images that I have after my JosephForwardProjectionImageFilter
> pass.
>
> My problem is that the values I obtain are quite different (sinogram of
> the images attached).
> The forward projected images are overall 1.7 times brighter than the
> reader images.
>
> Does anyone have an insight on what I could be doing wrong?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Thibault
> _______________________________________________
> Rtk-users mailing list
> Rtk-users at public.kitware.com
> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://public.kitware.com/pipermail/rtk-users/attachments/20210813/53883eba/attachment.htm>
More information about the Rtk-users
mailing list