[Paraview] Did we change vtk/numpy_interface/internal_algorithms dot routine?

[Berk Geveci]

Yes, in 2014, I added a dot function that is better suited to what folks
expect out of ParaView (do a dot of each vector on each point or cell). If
you want the numpy.dot, you can do:

import numpy
numpy.dot(a,b)

rather than just
dot(a,b)

In general, I would recommend not ever doing from numpy import * and always
using the numpy.XXX form.

Best,
-berk


On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Dennis Conklin <dennis_conklin at goodyear.com
> wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> I have a Paraview plugin which works in v4.4 but gives an error message
> (attached) in v5.4.1 (both Linux).
>
>
>
> Did we add some assertions in the dot routine, or did we switch from the
> native numpy dot to a vtk implementation.
>
>
>
> I am not at liberty to release the plugin to the general public, but it
> basically transforms global Cartesian strains into cylindrical coordinate
> strains.
>
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> Dennis
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20170925/520f9da6/attachment.html>