[Paraview] [EXTERNAL] Paraview 5.2.0: max time limit of 4095 for annotated .vtu file?

[David.Benn at csiro.au]

Thanks Alan.

Joachim Pouderoux replied shortly before you did, asking if I was willing to create a merge request and also noting that since this is a VTK related issue, it should be reported to the VTK tracker instead.

I'm happy to create a merge request (I'm assuming we're talking about a GitHub/Bitbucket style git pull request), but should we instead be doing this via the VTK gitlab rather than Paraview as Joachim mentions?

Alan, Joachim: please feel free to let me know what procedure to follow and I'll go with that.

Thanks.

David

From: Scott, W Alan [mailto:wascott at sandia.gov]
Sent: Thursday, 26 January 2017 4:31 AM
To: Benn, David (IM&T, Waite Campus) <David.Benn at csiro.au>; paraview at paraview.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Paraview 5.2.0: max time limit of 4095 for annotated .vtu file?

Thanks!  You definitely did a good job with that bug report!

Alan

From: David.Benn at csiro.au<mailto:David.Benn at csiro.au> [mailto:David.Benn at csiro.au]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:32 AM
To: Scott, W Alan <wascott at sandia.gov<mailto:wascott at sandia.gov>>; paraview at paraview.org<mailto:paraview at paraview.org>
Cc: David.Benn at csiro.au<mailto:David.Benn at csiro.au>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Paraview 5.2.0: max time limit of 4095 for annotated .vtu file?

I have submitted an issue for this:

  https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17135

David

From: Benn, David (IM&T, Waite Campus)
Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2017 5:25 PM
To: 'Scott, W Alan' <wascott at sandia.gov<mailto:wascott at sandia.gov>>; paraview at paraview.org<mailto:paraview at paraview.org>
Cc: Benn, David (IM&T, Waite Campus) <David.Benn at csiro.au<mailto:David.Benn at csiro.au>>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Paraview 5.2.0: max time limit of 4095 for annotated .vtu file?

Hi Alan

Sure, will do. I have also tested a solution.

David

From: Scott, W Alan [mailto:wascott at sandia.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2017 8:23 AM
To: Benn, David (IM&T, Waite Campus) <David.Benn at csiro.au<mailto:David.Benn at csiro.au>>; paraview at paraview.org<mailto:paraview at paraview.org>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Paraview 5.2.0: max time limit of 4095 for annotated .vtu file?

Looks like a bug.  Mind writing it up?  If you can give the developers a way to replicate the bug, it will significantly increase the chance it will be looked at...

https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues

Thanks,

Alan

From: ParaView [mailto:paraview-bounces at paraview.org] On Behalf Of David.Benn at csiro.au<mailto:David.Benn at csiro.au>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 12:02 AM
To: paraview at paraview.org<mailto:paraview at paraview.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Paraview 5.2.0: max time limit of 4095 for annotated .vtu file?

Upon loading an annotated .vtu file with TimeStep annotations such as this into Paraview 5.2.0 (under 64 bit SUSE Linux):

<DataArray type="Float64" Name="V" TimeStep="10560"  format="appended" RangeMin="-87.934331219"        RangeMax="-87.443353026"        offset="7801035604"          />

I see the following:

[cid:image001.png at 01D27C8B.17384DF0]

such that a maximum of 4095 time steps are available, as opposed to the expected 10,560 time steps.

When the non-annotated .vtu file is loaded, the expected number of frames are visible.

Is there some inherent limitation within Paraview that prevents more than 4095 time steps from being loaded/visualised?

Thanks.

David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20170201/7a70b18d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10819 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20170201/7a70b18d/attachment.png>