[Paraview] wallShearStress Calculation in Paraview
Stephen Wornom
stephen.wornom at inria.fr
Wed Dec 6 09:19:51 EST 2017
Thanks, but did you forget to include the name of the forum?
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ezhilmathi Krishnasamy" <ezhkr601 at student.liu.se>
> To: "Ahmet Ahmet" <ahmetskyland at gmail.com>
> Cc: "ParaView" <paraview at paraview.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 3:05:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] wallShearStress Calculation in Paraview
> Hi Ahmet,
> What you can do that is, use the filter name called extract surface.
> once you get that surface either you can export those values in form of from
> elements or from the points.
> It might work, or you may get more clear explanation from this forum.
> Cheers,
> Mathi
> On 6 December 2017 at 15:00, Ahmet Ahmet < ahmetskyland at gmail.com > wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
>
> > I have results with OpenFOAM including p,T,U outputs. Due to some reasons,
> > I
> > can't use wallShearStress or wallgradU utility in OF. So, I have to
> > calculate it on Paraview. I saw many topics related to that on google, but
> > I
> > could not find a satisfactory answer. My case is 3-D, compressible and
> > laminar but we can think about incompressible and may be 2-D.
>
> > I think the most important part for WSS is to calculate velocity gradient.
> > My
> > unsolved problem is to calculate that. How can I calculate gradients on the
> > wall? I have no-slip wall, that is u=0 and with Gradient of Unstructured
> > DataSet/Compute Derivatives filters, I obtained 0 on the wall. I think the
> > values in the nearest mesh to the wall should be accounted for. To do that,
> > what should I do?
>
> > Note:
>
> > 1. T he walls are not aligned with a coordinate axis. For this part, I
> > tried
> > to extract the wall surface and generate normal vectors.
>
> > 2. As an alternative to get directly on wall, I tried to get slice a little
> > bit over the wall surface and then take surface vector on slice then
> > gradient of unstructured dataset on surface vector. That gives me a result
> > but I am not sure it's true.
>
> > This may be simple for you, sorry for that.
>
> > Thank you in advance,
>
> > Ahmet
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20171206/d12191fc/attachment.html>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list