[Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Measure graphics performance?

[David E DeMarle]

Not sure what you mean by new_benchmark.py. You should run
benchmark/manyspheres.py.

It takes resolution and numspheres arguments. numspheres is the total
number of objects in the scene and each processors makes a diffent set of
them. Resolution is the phi&theta resolution of each that controls the
number of polygons each sphere has.





David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
RDECOM ARL (US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> wrote:

> Dave – I’m running the new_benchmark.py script from the command line
>
> pvpython new_benchmark.py
>
>
> Is there a way to jack up the number of polygons that the script generates?
>
> ________________________________
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone:  410-278-6266
>
> From: David E DeMarle <dave.demarle at kitware.com>
> Date: Monday, March 21, 2016 at 1:08 PM
> To: Rick Angelini <Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil>
> Cc: ParaView <paraview at paraview.org>
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Measure graphics performance?
>
> All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
> identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
> within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
> browser.
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> At the VTK single node level, enable Module_vtkUtilitiesBenchmarks module
> in cmake, compile and run bin/TimingTests
>
> At the ParaView multiple node level, Chuck Atkins is nearly done with
> revamping the old benchmark.py and adding to it a simple canonical test
> script that uses the programmable filter to make arbitrarily large meshes
> to test parallel rendering with. That can be found at: Caution-
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 < Caution-
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 >
>
>
>
>
> David E DeMarle
> Kitware, Inc.
> R&D Engineer
> 21 Corporate Drive
> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
> Phone: 518-881-4909
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
> RDECOM ARL (US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil < Caution-
> mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil>
>  > > wrote:
>
>> I need to do some quick performance tests to compare the results between
>> two graphics cards using “real world” applications.   Do you guys have a
>> benchmark handy to measure interactive graphics performance???????
>> ________________________________
>> Rick Angelini
>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
>> Phone:  410-278-6266 < tel:410-278-6266 >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by Caution-www.kitware.com < Caution-http://www.kitware.com >
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at Caution-
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html < Caution-
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: Caution-
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView < Caution-
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >
>>
>> Search the list archives at: Caution-
>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView < Caution-
>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview < Caution-
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160324/87f1ceae/attachment.html>