[Paraview] Custom Python plugin with multiple input ports

LB bravo.loic at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 14:37:09 EDT 2016


Hi Utkarsh,

Multiple input ports are exactly what I want.
But I can't get it to work. I've attached my last XML plugin attempt with
different port_index definition.

When I try to use it, I have the following error:

/ParaViewVTK/Common/ExecutionModel/vtkAlgorithm.cxx, line 893

vtkPythonProgrammableFilter (0x6c7a510): Attempt to connect input port
index 1 for an algorithm with 1 input ports.

Should I add something to tell ParaView that this filter has multiple input
ports?
Should I use a different class than the vtkPythonProgrammableFilter?

Regards,
-- 
Loïc

2016-07-15 17:36 GMT+02:00 Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>:

> Sorry for chiming in late, but here are some things to note:
>
> * Both Dennis and Cory are talking about multiple connections on the
> same input port. This is arguably not too well supported since the
> order cannot be determined easily.
> * Seems to me you want multiple input ports, each with a single
> connection. That's supported. Just not by the Python Filter Generator
> Script. Once you have the XML for the filter, you can indeed just add
> another <InputProperty /> tag to it as follows (note the "port_index"
> attribute):
>
> <InputProperty command="SetInputConnection"
>                          name="Input2"
>                          port_index="2">
>    <!-- fill with relevant domain information -->
> </InputProperty>
>
> Then, your python filter code can access data on each input port as:
>
> input1 = self.GetInputDataObject(0, 0)
> input2 = self.GetInputDataObject(1, 0)
>
> Here there's no confusion which data is on which input port.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Utkarsh
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Dennis Conklin
> <dennis_conklin at goodyear.com> wrote:
> > LB,
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, it is troublesome to not be able to tell which input is which inside
> > the Programmable filter.     Something I have done in the past is
> > differentiate them inside the filter.   I have tested for element type to
> > tell them apart, for example.  Something else I have heard of but have
> not
> > had to use is assigning a unique variable to one input and then testing
> for
> > that inside the filter to determine which input is which.
> >
> >
> >
> > None of this may address  your general problem, but here’s hoping.
> >
> >
> >
> > Dennis
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >
> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160715/ab984f7d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test_mulitport.xml
Type: text/xml
Size: 1521 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160715/ab984f7d/attachment.xml>


More information about the ParaView mailing list