[Paraview] Can a collaborative client share a pipeline without creating a view itself?

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Probably not, but then I assumed you had moved on. Are you still doing
this? Can you go back to your original use-case? What is your objective
with this? Maybe there are alternative approaches than using the
"collaboration" support, which frankly is rarely used and hence I'd
consider experimental.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Peter Debuchev <peterdebuchev at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Utkarsh,
> is there any chance that this issue is looked at during the upcoming
> hackathon?
>
> Peter
>
> 2016-06-28 17:46 GMT+02:00 Peter Debuchev <peterdebuchev at gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear Utkarsh,
>> I tried to reproduce the error as described in my previous email, but
>> haven't been able to until now, don't know what happend. The attached code
>> attaches to a pvserver at localhost:11111 and adds a sphere every half
>> second. Unfortunately it crashes as soon as I connect ParaView to the same
>> server.
>> I guess I'll have to give up programming ParaView and work the old way,
>> writing VTK files and loading them in ParaView. It is way too complicated.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> 2016-06-24 7:08 GMT+02:00 Peter Debuchev <peterdebuchev at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Thank you for the patch. There is still something missing. If I modify
>>> the custom client such that it adds an object every half second or so, then
>>> first start this clients and then ParaView after a few seconds, ParaView
>>> misses one of the objects. ParaView finds those objects that are added
>>> before ParaView starts and those that are added later. But during ParaView
>>> startup one of the objects is lost.
>>> I'll see if I can make this reproducible and send a code example in the
>>> next days.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> 2016-06-22 17:25 GMT+02:00 Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>
>>> :
>>>
>>>> > can you give a quick update whether the suggested bug fix is likely
>>>> to be
>>>> > solved:
>>>>
>>>> Here you go:
>>>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/844
>>>>
>>>> Once the dashboards come back clean, this will get merged. If do get
>>>> around to testing it, I'd suggest getting involved and giving the
>>>> merge-request a +1 ;).
>>>>
>>>> Utkarsh
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160713/8f2f2836/attachment.html>