[Paraview] VRUI vs. VRPN
Faiz Abidi
fabidi89 at vt.edu
Mon Apr 18 18:25:20 EDT 2016
Thanks for your input, Mark. I think we'll go ahead with VRPN as well. FYI,
we use DTK <https://github.com/lanceman2/diverse> for tracking for
InstantReality.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Stock, Mark <Mark.Stock at nrel.gov> wrote:
> Faiz,
>
> We use both at NREL, but have had a much easier time with VRPN; not only
> with setting things up for ParaView integration, but also with stability.
> Ultimately, your choice should depend on which system your trackers and
> devices will interface with more easily.
>
> Mark
>
> From: ParaView <paraview-bounces at paraview.org<mailto:
> paraview-bounces at paraview.org>> on behalf of Faiz Abidi <fabidi89 at vt.edu
> <mailto:fabidi89 at vt.edu>>
> Date: Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 11:31 AM
> To: "paraview at paraview.org<mailto:paraview at paraview.org>" <
> paraview at paraview.org<mailto:paraview at paraview.org>>
> Subject: [Paraview] VRUI vs. VRPN
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Wondering if there are any advantages/disadvantages of using one over the
> other. We have Paraview5.0 running on Ubuntu driving a 4 walled CAVE. Any
> suggestions?
> --
> Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com<
> http://www.faizabidi.com> | +1-540-998-6636
>
--
Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
+1-540-998-6636
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160418/562995e4/attachment.html>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list