[Paraview] [EXT] Re: Programmable Filter with Multiple Inputs

[Dennis Conklin]

Utkarsh,

Ok, thanks for that information.   For my present case I can do some testing to determine which is which, but that limits how general purpose I can make a PF with multiple inputs.    There is not always a reasonable test which is known ahead of time.

Dennis

From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 11:12 AM
To: Dennis Conklin
Cc: Paraview (paraview at paraview.org)
Subject: [EXT] Re: [Paraview] Programmable Filter with Multiple Inputs

Dennis,

That's indeed a problem, currently the order of inputs for the Programmable Filter is cryptic and inconsistent. I am going to see what I can do to fix this. It's a major annoyance.

http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=15710

Utkarsh

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Dennis Conklin <dennis_conklin at goodyear.com<mailto:dennis_conklin at goodyear.com>> wrote:
All,

I’m a little uncertain about Programmable Filters with multiple inputs.   I had been assuming that if I had 2 inputs, then inputs[0] is the input that’s higher up in the Pipeline Browser, and inputs[1] is the lower input in the Pipeline Browser, but that does not always seem to be the case.     Is there some way to invoke the PF in such a way that I can know which input will be which?

Thanks

Dennis

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com>

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20150908/cd4a7dc0/attachment.html>