[Paraview] paraview for a "new" application

Dan Lipsa dan.lipsa at kitware.com
Sat Jun 6 22:07:52 EDT 2015


Hi Paul,
Indeed #2 makes sense, especially if you want to change the in-house
format. To write the file (from the simulation) it seems to me you should
checkout

https://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/doc/fortran/index.html

I don't see why ParaView would be used in that process. Am I missing
something?
Dan



On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 8:04 AM Paul Anton Letnes <pa at letnes.com> wrote:

> Hi, fellow paraviewers!
>
> I’ve spent some time playing with tutorials and user manuals, and so far
> I’m impressed with what paraview can do.
>
> I am working on a specialized structural engineering program that, mainly,
> performs simulations of pipes with circular cross sections. Each pipe is
> split into nodes and 1D elements, and results are reported at points (or,
> less commonly, elements) along the pipe.
>
> Some results are reported once per cross section; e.g, the tension in the
> pipe has a single value for the entire cross section. Other results, e.g.
> plastic strain, is reported for a number of points along the circumference
> of the pipe (say, 5-50 points), for each of the cross sections. The results
> can be either “snapshots” or time series.
>
> After what I’ve seen from the paraview documentation, possible approaches
> include:
> 1. Create a paraview plugin to read our current in-house file format.
> 2. Directly write output files in an already supported format.
> 3. Write pvpython scripts that perform the conversion on the fly.
>
> Approach 1 is probably a lot of work and the file format is not of
> interest to anyone else (optimally, I’d like to replace it), so this seems
> less attractive. Approach 3 is probably less user-friendly for our users.
>
> The second approach seems sensible, but the paraview documentation does
> not give many examples of how to do this. Optimally, I’d like to write a
> hdf5-based format (xdmf? netcdf? raw hdf5?) directly from Fortran, but I
> haven’t found documentation on how to do this. Using hdf5 seems attractive
> as it’s so widely supported by e.g. matlab, python, and other
> postprocessing tools used in the industry. Getting a single results
> database would simplify a lot of workflows!
>
> What would you guys do?
>
> Cheers
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20150607/781c5411/attachment.html>


More information about the ParaView mailing list