[Paraview] 3D contour smoothness

Philipp E pspeachum at gmail.com
Fri Sep 19 10:48:15 EDT 2014


Hi Cory,

thank you for your fast feedback.

a) Compute normal is checked. (Without normals, the contour is
completely stepped)
b) Contour values are the same.

Regards
Philipp

On 09/19/2014 04:40 PM, Cory Quammen wrote:
> Philipp,
>
> In the contour filter, is the option "Compute Normals" checked in 4.0 RC1?
>
> Also, are the contour values the same between the two versions?
>
> Thanks,
> Cory
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Philipp E <pspeachum at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> after extensive search I was desperate enough to post on this list:
>>
>> It appears that the surface smoothing algorithm of the contour filter
>> does not work as "aggressive" as in older version (3.14.1 was the last
>> one we found to do so). As an example I prepared this two screenshots,
>> VTK data are scalars on a structured grid (200x100x100), legacy format.
>> (An additional call of the "smooth" filter does not help.)
>>
>> 3.14.1
>> http://s7.directupload.net/images/140919/euadfvko.png
>> 4.0.RC1
>> http://s14.directupload.net/images/140919/84y689mi.png
>>
>> Both versions are running with the shipped settings. Since the effect
>> could be reproduced on several workstations, we are wondering whether
>> there has been an (undocumented?) change in the filter mechanism or some
>> option we/setting/data problem we are not aware of.
>>
>> Kind regards and thanks in advance
>> Philipp Engels.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview



More information about the ParaView mailing list