[Paraview] ParaView superbuild git question (UNCLASSIFIED)

Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US) richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil
Tue Oct 14 09:07:04 EDT 2014


Should you also update the Paraview SuperBuild wiki page?

________________________________
Rick Angelini
USArmy Research Laboratory
CISD/HPC Architectures Team
Phone:  410-278-6266




On 10/14/14, 8:57 AM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>
wrote:

>Tag "v4.2.0-1" is now available on the ParaView Superbuild repo.
>
>Utkarsh
>
>
>On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit
><utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>> Doh! I see I added the tag but forgot to toggle the git/branch name,
>> which for 4.1.0 I had set to be "release". I'll add a new "v4.2.0-1"
>> tag fixing this issue.
>>
>> Again, really sorry about this :/.
>>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
>> ARL (US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> wrote:
>>> Yes - we want the 4.2.0 tag on the Superbuild (and for all future
>>> production releases).   In an earlier message on the this thread, Corey
>>> implied that it was no longer supported ….  of course, at this point
>>>we’re
>>> more or less done  with the 4.2.0 implementation.  Next time, it would
>>>be
>>> nice to have when the production release is announced!   8-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Rick Angelini
>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
>>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/14/14, 8:45 AM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Rick,
>>>>
>>>>Are you taking referring to  the "v4.1.0" tag on the superbuild repo?
>>>>I'll add the v4.2.0 tag soon -- it just slipped my mind. Sorry about
>>>>that.
>>>>
>>>>Utkarsh
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
>>>>ARL (US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> wrote:
>>>>> When doing a clean production build, it’s very  useful to be able to
>>>>>do
>>>>>a
>>>>> “git pull” to get all of the correct tarballs downloaded.   The
>>>>> functionality that was previous to 4.2.0 was exactly appropriate -
>>>>>“git
>>>>> checkout v4.1.0”
>>>>>
>>>>> The alternative (as I understand it) is to enable GIT and do a build
>>>>>from
>>>>> the development tree.  (This will pull all of the tarballs for the
>>>>> supporting libraries).   Then re-run the build with “GIT=OFF” ,
>>>>>manually
>>>>> download the production tarball, and then re-run the build.   Does
>>>>>this
>>>>> sound like the best solution?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________
>>>>> Rick Angelini
>>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>>>> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
>>>>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/11/14, 6:04 PM, "Cory Quammen" <cory.quammen at kitware.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Simon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What you are doing as a workaround is indeed how production builds
>>>>>>should be created. The ParaView superbuild is now set up to check out
>>>>>>the master branch of ParaView, which varies day to day. In 4.1 and
>>>>>>prior to that, it was set up to check out out the release branch,
>>>>>>which was far more static. If you disable ParaView_FROM_GIT in CMake,
>>>>>>it will download the release source tar ball and build from that,
>>>>>>essentially what you have been doing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'll update the superbuild wiki instructions to note this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Best regards,
>>>>>>Cory
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Su, Simon M CTR USARMY ARL (US)
>>>>>><simon.m.su.ctr at mail.mil> wrote:
>>>>>>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>>>>>>> Caveats: NONE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/Superbuild mentioned, if I
>>>>>>>want
>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>> build a specific version, I will do
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git clone git://paraview.org/ParaViewSuperbuild.git
>>>>>>> cd ParaViewSuperbuild
>>>>>>> git checkout v4.1.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That has always worked for me for v4.1.0 tag
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But with v4.2.0 release, if I do the following on different days,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git clone git://paraview.org/ParaViewSuperbuild.git
>>>>>>> cd ParaViewSuperbuild
>>>>>>> git checkout v4.2.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am getting v4.2.0-${SOME HASH NUMBER} that is different every
>>>>>>>time.
>>>>>>>Am I
>>>>>>> missing something? This is causing me problem when I am trying to
>>>>>>>get
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>> same version of ParaView mesa and osmesa build for client/server
>>>>>>>mode.
>>>>>>>I end
>>>>>>> up doing a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -DParaView_URL=../paraview/ParaView-v4.2.0-source.tar.gz
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To get around the problem. Thoughts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -simon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>>>>>>> Caveats: NONE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>>>http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>>>>>>http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>>http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>>>>>http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>>>>http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>>>
>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>



More information about the ParaView mailing list