[Paraview] Data set Size limit in ParaView/HDF5
Michael Jackson
mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
Wed Nov 5 14:03:23 EST 2014
I was trying to directly update the source codes then compile my own. That didn't work. I was able to build ParaView 4.2.0 against my installed HDF5 (1.8.13) and have it create the package in the /Applications BUT not all the libraries got "fixed up". The Qt libraries and my HDF5 libraries did not get their "install_name" fixed.
Do I need to build from the "SuperBuild" to actually create a new package I can give to my employees?
Thanks
Mike Jackson
On Nov 5, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Are you talking about updating the HDF5 in ParaView source itself or
> in the binaries we distribute?
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Michael Jackson
> <mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
>> Thanks for getting the bug report in. I was poking around the ParaView source and it does not look straight forward at all to substitute in a prebuilt HDF5 library (system hdf5). I can not even find the CMake Variables that might let me do this. I tried so simply substitute the latest stable HDF5 into the source tree but as I figured CMake threw lots of errors. If you give me a gentle nudge I might be able to help a bit. We are really being held back by this with our current data sets.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mike Jackson
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds good. I'll work on updating the HDF5 version for next release.
>>>
>>> http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=15106
>>>
>>> Utkarsh
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Michael Jackson
>>> <mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
>>>> The current version of ParaView (4.2.1) uses a fairly old version of HDF5 (API version 1.8.9). This version has a nasty bug on OS X that will not allow HDF5 to read a data set that is larger than 4GB (2^32). This is due to a bug in the configuration process that incorrectly identifies a "size_t" as being unsigned 32 bit integer on Darwin instead of a 64 bit unsigned integer. What is the possibility of getting a newer HDF5 included in ParaView for the next release?
>>>>
>>>> BTW. a new release of HDF5 is coming in a few weeks. This would make a great opportunity to get this fixed with the latest version of HDF5.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Mike Jackson
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>
>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>
>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>>
>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list