[Paraview] Attempting to run Catalyst CFullExample

[Bill Sherman]

Hello again,

> FYI: I just updated the Catalyst examples (commit SHA
> f041507af5f6f010c9f8a2de8b3014ae19a2394b) to work with ParaView as of
> today's gatekeeper review (commit SHA
> a3508bd9e0164c85968d6cde64e2275cd57aab3c).

Great.  I now have some time to do more testing and learning.

> If you get issues, let me know.

Okay, so I'm now getting a different error when I run the Catalyst
application/script:
	% ./FEDriver SampleScripts/feslicescript.py
	Traceback (most recent call last):
	  File "<string>", line 2, in <module>
	  File "SampleScripts/feslicescript.py", line 87, in DoCoProcessing
	    coprocessor.DoLiveVisualization(datadescription, "localhost", 22222)
	  File 
"/home/avl/VR/Apps/ParaView/ParaView_git20130528/Build/lib/site-packages/paraview/coprocessing.py", 
line 155, in DoLiveVisualization
	    self.__LiveVisualizationLink = servermanager.vtkLiveInsituLink()
	NameError: global name 'servermanager' is not defined

And that is repeated 11 times.


So, the versions I'm using are: the Catalyst examples from master.zip
where the files are all dated 05/29/13 17:59.

And a ParaView git clone that reports:
	% git show HEAD
	commit 723b5455491ef913ed1083f75e34c2820d1f06e8
	Merge: d915ca0 3e6ceec
	Author: Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>
	Date:   Fri May 24 10:41:11 2013 -0400

	    Merge topic 'update_version_rc2'

	    3e6ceec Update version to 4.0.0-RC2

So I guess that's a slightly different commit than what you were
testing against -- but I downloaded it 05/28/13, so only one day
difference.

I can try a newer (or different) version of ParaView, but I'm not
sufficiently familiar with git to know how to request a specific
commit code.

Recommendations?

> Andy

	Thank you,
	Bill

>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Bill Sherman <shermanw at indiana.edu
> <mailto:shermanw at indiana.edu>> wrote:
>
>     Lucas, Andy,
>
>     Thank you both for your responses.
>
>
>     On 05/29/2013 12:42 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
>         Hi Bill & Lucas,
>
>         I was on vacation the last several days and am now finally
>         catching up.
>
>         Thanks for the info on the examples not working with the 4.0 release
>         candidates. I haven't tested them in a while so it's possible that
>         something is out of sync. As Lucas mentioned, Catalyst had quite
>         a bit
>         of changes recently but it should have calmed down by now. I'll
>         try and
>         get the examples updated as well in the next couple of days. Once
>         ParaView 4.0 comes out I'll tag the examples as well and
>         hopefully in
>         the not too distant future put up a dashboard with the examples
>         running
>         against ParaView master to help keep things in sync.
>
>
>     Great.
>
>
>         I think Lucas answered your questions well but let us know if
>         there's
>         still something that isn't quite clear.
>
>
>     Yes, I think once I see a working example and the steps needed to get
>     there I should be off to the races. I haven't decided yet whether I'll
>     go back and compile the 05/14/13 version of ParaView, or perhaps wait
>     until you've had a chance to update the examples for the upcoming
>     release.
>
>     I've got a book chapter due, so I may just wait until I get that done
>     and see where things are.
>
>         Regards,
>         Andy
>
>
>     Thanks again for your help,
>     Bill
>
>