[Paraview] visibility in animations
Uriel Zajaczkovski
uzajaczk at ucsd.edu
Wed Feb 6 16:40:47 EST 2013
That's great. Thanks!
-Uriel
On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> I've pushed a fix for this. If that doesn't introduce any dashboard
> issues, we'll have it in the upcoming 3.98.1 release.
>
> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=13863
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>> I can indeed reproduce this bug. I'm looking into it.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Uriel Zajaczkovski <uzajaczk at ucsd.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi Utkarsh,
>>>
>>> I'm using 3.98, but I also tried with an old install (3.14).
>>>
>>> I've managed to reproduce the problem with a small dataset. I'm loading the
>>> data as netcdf (structured curvilinear grid). If a create an animation and
>>> change the visibility property from 0 to 1 using a step function I get this
>>> error:
>>>
>>> ERROR: In
>>> /Users/kitware/Dashboards/MyTests/NightlyMaster/ParaViewSuperbuild-Release-NoMPI/paraview/src/paraview/VTK/Rendering/VolumeOpenGL/vtkOpenGLProjectedTetrahedraMapper.cxx,
>>> line 375, vtkOpenGLProjectedTetrahedraMapper (0x11d17b010): Can't use
>>> projected tetrahedra without scalars!
>>>
>>> Here's the file I'm using (~1.5mb):
>>> http://www-pord.ucsd.edu/~uriel/files/GEBCO_grid_DIMES3a.nc
>>>
>>> Could someone check this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uriel
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 6, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It should work indeed. What version of ParaView are you using?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Uriel Zajaczkovski <uzajaczk at ucsd.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I'm working on an animation and I would like to change the visibility of
>>> some of the layers during the animation. It seems to be working fine when I
>>> apply the visibility property (in Animation view) to the data, but not for
>>> any child of that instance (i.e., the data + some filter,
>>> calculator+threshold in this case). Is this a missing feature or a bug? or
>>> perhaps I'm missing something and it can be done?
>>> Just for reference, this is the animation:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wJBAEooDSU
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uriel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20130206/7e1cc376/attachment.htm>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list