[Paraview] Inconsistent results with the stream trace filter
Yuanxin Liu
leo.liu at kitware.com
Thu Oct 18 14:00:07 EDT 2012
No, I did not use Tetrahedralize.
Are you using the lastest development version? Are you running paraview as
a single process?
Do you mind saving a state file of your session and post it?
thanks!
Leo
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Joe Borġ <mail at jdborg.com> wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> You don't seem to have used the Tetrahedralise filter? How have you got
> this to work without that?
>
> Mine works fine after setting the fluid as input and source as the inlet,
> but I must first use the Tetrahedralise filter.
>
>
> Regards,
> Joseph David Borġ
> http://www.jdborg.com
>
>
> On 17 October 2012 18:14, Yuanxin Liu <leo.liu at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> I am not seeing exactly what you are seeing. In the attached image
>> produced with the current master, I created a stream tracer with outlet
>> block as the seeds and the fluid block as the input, and the streamlines
>> seem right.
>>
>> But I think there is a bug in how the stream tracer handles multiblock
>> data, because if I change the stream tracer input to the whole pipe data
>> set, instead of just the fluid block, some stream lines go straight to the
>> void like you described.
>>
>> Can you try setting up the pipeline as I did using ExtractBlock and
>> compare with my image?
>>
>> Leo
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Magician <f_magician at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>>
>>> "Tetrahedralize" filter is applicable.
>>> All cells are splitted into Tetrahedral ones.
>>> Try it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Magician
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2012/10/17, at 23:40, Joe Borġ wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks Magician,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for testing. What are you using to convert to tet? Is it a
>>> ParaView feature?
>>> >
>>> > Leo, can the priority of the bug be raised please?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Joseph David Borġ
>>> > http://www.jdborg.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 17 October 2012 14:20, Magician <f_magician at mac.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Joseph,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I tried your data and got a result as yours.
>>> > Your data only includes Hex, Wedge, Tet and Pyramid,
>>> > but streamlines are stopped earlier.
>>> >
>>> > Same as my polyhedral pipe sample, I applied Tetrahedralize filter
>>> > to your pipe source, and I could get valid streamlines.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Magician
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > Pipe.tar.gz attached to the bug report below, in the form of an
>>> Ensight
>>> > > Case. First extract the archive and to open in Paraview, use "All
>>> files
>>> > > (*)" when browsing and select the .encas, then select "EnSight
>>> Files".
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Joseph David Borġ
>>> > > http://www.jdborg.com
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 12 October 2012 03:28, Yuanxin Liu <leo.liu at kitware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi,
>>> > > > Is it possible for you to upload the data? By the way, if the
>>> cell
>>> > > > type is polyhedron, then this is quite likely the same bug as this:
>>> > > > http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=13442
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Leo
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Joe Borġ <mail at jdborg.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> Hi guys,
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> I've got an odd issue with the stream trace and stream trace
>>> custom
>>> > > >> source filters in Paraview (3.14.1 64bit). No matter what
>>> settings I use,
>>> > > >> the traces die off very soon and some even carry on straight
>>> (even when
>>> > > >> there's no fluid).
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> See the two screenshots I've got from Paraview.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> http://jdborg.com/images/paraview/pv_inlet.png
>>> > > >> http://jdborg.com/images/paraview/pv_outlet.png
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Not sure if this is a setting that's easy to miss or if it's more
>>> > > >> terminal.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Thanks,
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Regards,
>>> > > >> Joseph David Borġ
>>> > > >> http://www.jdborg.com
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20121018/26df425d/attachment.htm>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list