[Paraview] build error with boost and additional questions

Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com
Wed Mar 28 10:47:38 EDT 2012


Looks like I was using git-master and things are fine and peachy
there. I do get the error with 3.14.0 tag. We may just have to bite
the bullet and wait for the next major release for this fix. In
anycase, the next major release is just months away :).

Utkarsh

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit
<utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> This is odd. I just tried the same with a server built without VisIt
> bridge and a client with VisitBridge and tried to load a bov file and
> ParaView nicely told me to pick the reader to use since it could not
> decide which one to use.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Chourasia, Amit <amit at sdsc.edu> wrote:
>> This was the error reported when I loaded a .bov file
>>
>> Connection URL: cs://gcn-13-47.sdsc.edu:11111
>> Accepting connection(s): gcn-13-47.sdsc.edu:11111
>> Client connected.
>> ERROR: In /oasis/scratch/amit/temp_project/ParaView-3.14.0-Source/ParaViewCore/ServerImplementation/vtkSIProxyDefinitionManager.cxx, line 543
>> vtkSIProxyDefinitionManager (0x753c60): No proxy that matches: group=sources and proxy=VisItBOVReader were found.
>>
>> ERROR: In /oasis/scratch/amit/temp_project/ParaView-3.14.0-Source/ParaViewCore/ServerImplementation/vtkSIProxy.cxx, line 292
>> vtkSISourceProxy (0xab9000): Definition not found for xml_group: sources and xml_name: VisItBOVReader
>> global_id: 3404
>> location: 2
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>>
>>> What version of ParaView was this?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Chourasia, Amit <amit at sdsc.edu> wrote:
>>>> My server side Paraview build was built without visit bridge.
>>>> On client side I used binaries for OS X 64 bit
>>>> I established a cs session and when I tired to open a .bov file both client and server crashed.
>>>> Utkarsh this behaviour seems buggy as per your explanation.
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> If we don't explicitly enable the bridge on the server side, and user is
>>>>>> making use of client from the KW binaries, will it crash if a file type
>>>>>> associated to the bridge is opened?
>>>>>
>>>>> No it won't, starting 3.14. With 3.14 the client fetches the list of
>>>>> available proxies from the server, so if the server doesn't have the
>>>>> VisIt bridge enabled, the readers simply won't be available for the
>>>>> client.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> do you think that the PV binaries c/should be built with the default build
>>>>>> options, to reduce incompatibilities? but also maybe to improve the cmake
>>>>>> coverage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure what you mean exactly. Are you saying the default cmake
>>>>> values should be the ones that we use to build PV binaries? I think
>>>>> the superbuild proposal will address this issue. Using the superbuild
>>>>> it would be easier to build binaries using similar settings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Utkarsh
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>
>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>
>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>>
>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


More information about the ParaView mailing list