[Paraview] build error with boost and additional questions

[Chourasia, Amit]

This was the error reported when I loaded a .bov file

Connection URL: cs://gcn-13-47.sdsc.edu:11111
Accepting connection(s): gcn-13-47.sdsc.edu:11111
Client connected.
ERROR: In /oasis/scratch/amit/temp_project/ParaView-3.14.0-Source/ParaViewCore/ServerImplementation/vtkSIProxyDefinitionManager.cxx, line 543
vtkSIProxyDefinitionManager (0x753c60): No proxy that matches: group=sources and proxy=VisItBOVReader were found.

ERROR: In /oasis/scratch/amit/temp_project/ParaView-3.14.0-Source/ParaViewCore/ServerImplementation/vtkSIProxy.cxx, line 292
vtkSISourceProxy (0xab9000): Definition not found for xml_group: sources and xml_name: VisItBOVReader
global_id: 3404
location: 2



On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:

> What version of ParaView was this?
> 
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Chourasia, Amit <amit at sdsc.edu> wrote:
>> My server side Paraview build was built without visit bridge.
>> On client side I used binaries for OS X 64 bit
>> I established a cs session and when I tired to open a .bov file both client and server crashed.
>> Utkarsh this behaviour seems buggy as per your explanation.
>> 
>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>> 
>>>> If we don't explicitly enable the bridge on the server side, and user is
>>>> making use of client from the KW binaries, will it crash if a file type
>>>> associated to the bridge is opened?
>>> 
>>> No it won't, starting 3.14. With 3.14 the client fetches the list of
>>> available proxies from the server, so if the server doesn't have the
>>> VisIt bridge enabled, the readers simply won't be available for the
>>> client.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> do you think that the PV binaries c/should be built with the default build
>>>> options, to reduce incompatibilities? but also maybe to improve the cmake
>>>> coverage?
>>> 
>>> Not sure what you mean exactly. Are you saying the default cmake
>>> values should be the ones that we use to build PV binaries? I think
>>> the superbuild proposal will address this issue. Using the superbuild
>>> it would be easier to build binaries using similar settings.
>>> 
>>> Utkarsh
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>> 
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> 
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>> 
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview