[Paraview] build error with boost and additional questions

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

What version of ParaView was this?

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Chourasia, Amit <amit at sdsc.edu> wrote:
> My server side Paraview build was built without visit bridge.
> On client side I used binaries for OS X 64 bit
> I established a cs session and when I tired to open a .bov file both client and server crashed.
> Utkarsh this behaviour seems buggy as per your explanation.
>
> On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>
>>> If we don't explicitly enable the bridge on the server side, and user is
>>> making use of client from the KW binaries, will it crash if a file type
>>> associated to the bridge is opened?
>>
>> No it won't, starting 3.14. With 3.14 the client fetches the list of
>> available proxies from the server, so if the server doesn't have the
>> VisIt bridge enabled, the readers simply won't be available for the
>> client.
>>
>>
>>> do you think that the PV binaries c/should be built with the default build
>>> options, to reduce incompatibilities? but also maybe to improve the cmake
>>> coverage?
>>
>> Not sure what you mean exactly. Are you saying the default cmake
>> values should be the ones that we use to build PV binaries? I think
>> the superbuild proposal will address this issue. Using the superbuild
>> it would be easier to build binaries using similar settings.
>>
>> Utkarsh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview