[Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues

Mon Mar 5 14:31:03 EST 2012

http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12972

On 03/05/2012 11:40 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:
>
> which stuff in the point sprite is causing trouble? I wanted to redo 
> some of it because now that I know more of the internals of the pqXXX 
> classes, there is some stuff that is a little obsolete in the PSPlugin.
>
> JB
>
> *From:*paraview-bounces at paraview.org 
> [mailto:paraview-bounces at paraview.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert Maynard
> *Sent:* 05 March 2012 20:36
> *To:* Burlen Loring
> *Cc:* paraview at paraview.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we can fix this by modifying the PointSprite plugin to check 
> to see if the VisIt Bridge is enabled and to conditional building the 
> conflicting classes only when the Bridge is disabled or we can name 
> mangle the VisIt classes that the PointSprite plugin is building.
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Burlen Loring <bloring at lbl.gov 
> <mailto:bloring at lbl.gov>> wrote:
>
> Sorry, misread your reply, sounds like you would prefer to keep 
> visit-bridge on. But will you disabled point-sprite in the binary 
> release? I noticed that when the client has it but server does not it 
> causes a crash.
>
>
>
> On 03/05/2012 11:11 AM, Burlen Loring wrote:
>
> So are you disabling VisIt bridge in the binary release? If not would 
> it still lead to a crash if the binary has VB on, and the server has 
> VB off?
>
> On 03/05/2012 11:21 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>
> Yes, I believe we ran into that as well. Short of re-factoring the
> PointSpritePlugin, the work around for now is to disable the
> point-sprite plugin when using visit-bridge and static builds.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Burlen Loring<bloring at lbl.gov 
> <mailto:bloring at lbl.gov>>  wrote:
>
> Utkarsh,
>
> By the way, not a huge issue but I also had a problem with static builds
> when trying to enable the visit bridge. The visit bridge and the Point
> Sprite Pluign both had copies of some of the same code.
> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12972
>
>
> Burlen
>
> On 03/05/2012 10:12 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>
> Burlen,
>
> To give you an update, we have decided to put out a patch release
> within the next week or so that should include the fix for this bug.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Burlen Loring<bloring at lbl.gov 
> <mailto:bloring at lbl.gov>>    wrote:
>
> That seems to have fixed the problem, thanks Utkarsh!
>
>
> On 02/29/2012 03:43 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>
> Burlen,
>
> Attached is a patch. Can you please verify if that solves the issue?
> Seems to working now in my tests.
>
> Thanks
> Utkarsh
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com <mailto:utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>>     
>  wrote:
>
> Burlen,
>
> I haven't tried reproducing the problem, but looking at the code, it's
> pretty obvious why it could fail. I'll work on a fix soon. I think
> this and few other state file backwards compatibility related issues
> that been reported may warrant a quick patch release. But I'll check
> with the team once I get back next week and give everyone an update.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Burlen Loring<bloring at lbl.gov 
> <mailto:bloring at lbl.gov>>
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> yes things are fine in 3.12 it's only with 3.14 that I'm having this
> issue.
>
> Burlen
>
>
> On 02/29/2012 10:52 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote:
>
> Burlen - I've been testing with 3.12, not 3.14 ... did things work
> for
> you
> in 3.12 and they are now broken in 3.14?
> ________________________________
> Rick Angelini
>
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch
> HPC Architectures Development Team
> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center)  Data Analysis&        Assessment
>  Center
> Phone: 410-278-6266 <tel:410-278-6266>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Burlen Loring [bloring at lbl.gov <mailto:bloring at lbl.gov>]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:29 PM
> To: Angelini, Richard C CIV (US)
> Cc: paraview at paraview.org <mailto:paraview at paraview.org>
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> Good, maybe it's something specific to my configuration although I
> don't
> have any idea what it could be off hand. Just to be sure: do you mean
> that you haven't had noticed problems or that you've positively
> verified
> that after using the enum once you could change the value?
>
> thanks
> Burlen
>
> On 02/29/2012 10:31 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote:
>
> What platform is the client running on?   We make extensive use of
> pvsc
> and enumerations and have not seen this  (mis)behavior on our
> Mac/Linux
> client workstations......
> ________________________________
> Rick Angelini
>
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch
> HPC Architectures Development Team
> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center)  Data Analysis&
> Assessment
>  Center
> Phone: 410-278-6266 <tel:410-278-6266>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: paraview-bounces at paraview.org 
> <mailto:paraview-bounces at paraview.org> [paraview-bounces at paraview.org 
> <mailto:paraview-bounces at paraview.org>]
> on
> behalf of Burlen Loring [bloring at lbl.gov <mailto:bloring at lbl.gov>]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:58 PM
> To: paraview at paraview.org <mailto:paraview at paraview.org>
> Subject: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>
> Hi,
>
> I've encountered bugs with pvsc enumerations in version 3.14.0. I
> have
> the attached pvsc that makes use of a couple of enumerations. After
> connecting once w/ this pvsc, neither of the enums save the user's
> choice in the GUI the next time the server is used. However they
> seem
> to
> remember the user's last choice internally and always uses that
> instead
> of what the user has selected in the GUI. Neither setting save=false
> or
> removing the default attribute helps. I filed the bug report here.
> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12969 If it's confirmed would
> the
> bug be fixed in another 3.14 release? or should I simply remove
> enumerations from our pvsc's for 3.14?
>
> Burlen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>
> -- 
> Robert Maynard
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20120305/d64b39a0/attachment-0001.htm>