[Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues

Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com
Wed Feb 29 18:43:36 EST 2012


Burlen,

Attached is a patch. Can you please verify if that solves the issue?
Seems to working now in my tests.

Thanks
Utkarsh

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
<utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> Burlen,
>
> I haven't tried reproducing the problem, but looking at the code, it's
> pretty obvious why it could fail. I'll work on a fix soon. I think
> this and few other state file backwards compatibility related issues
> that been reported may warrant a quick patch release. But I'll check
> with the team once I get back next week and give everyone an update.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Burlen Loring <bloring at lbl.gov> wrote:
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> yes things are fine in 3.12 it's only with 3.14 that I'm having this issue.
>>
>> Burlen
>>
>>
>> On 02/29/2012 10:52 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote:
>>>
>>> Burlen - I've been testing with 3.12, not 3.14 ... did things work for you
>>> in 3.12 and they are now broken in 3.14?
>>> ________________________________
>>> Rick Angelini
>>>
>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch
>>> HPC Architectures Development Team
>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center)  Data Analysis&  Assessment  Center
>>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Burlen Loring [bloring at lbl.gov]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:29 PM
>>> To: Angelini, Richard C CIV (US)
>>> Cc: paraview at paraview.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>>>
>>> Hi Rick,
>>>
>>> Good, maybe it's something specific to my configuration although I don't
>>> have any idea what it could be off hand. Just to be sure: do you mean
>>> that you haven't had noticed problems or that you've positively verified
>>> that after using the enum once you could change the value?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Burlen
>>>
>>> On 02/29/2012 10:31 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What platform is the client running on?   We make extensive use of pvsc
>>>> and enumerations and have not seen this  (mis)behavior on our Mac/Linux
>>>> client workstations......
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> Rick Angelini
>>>>
>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch
>>>> HPC Architectures Development Team
>>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center)  Data Analysis&   Assessment
>>>>  Center
>>>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: paraview-bounces at paraview.org [paraview-bounces at paraview.org] on
>>>> behalf of Burlen Loring [bloring at lbl.gov]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:58 PM
>>>> To: paraview at paraview.org
>>>> Subject: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've encountered bugs with pvsc enumerations in version 3.14.0. I have
>>>> the attached pvsc that makes use of a couple of enumerations. After
>>>> connecting once w/ this pvsc, neither of the enums save the user's
>>>> choice in the GUI the next time the server is used. However they seem to
>>>> remember the user's last choice internally and always uses that instead
>>>> of what the user has selected in the GUI. Neither setting save=false or
>>>> removing the default attribute helps. I filed the bug report here.
>>>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12969 If it's confirmed would the
>>>> bug be fixed in another 3.14 release? or should I simply remove
>>>> enumerations from our pvsc's for 3.14?
>>>>
>>>> Burlen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-BUG-12969.-Checkboxes-and-Comboboxes-not-working-cor.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6613 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20120229/21023544/attachment.obj>


More information about the ParaView mailing list