[Paraview] [Xdmf] unexpected usage of ghost sets for geometry and topology with XDMF reader

[Chris Kees]

Utkarsh,

Thanks a lot. I'm putting together a good data set to use as a test
and will put it on a server later tonight or tomorrow.

Chris

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
<utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I was able to locate the conversation/patch you are referring to. If
> there's a sample dataset that you can share that I can use for
> testing, I'd like to add a dashboard test for this so that we don't
> break this functionality in the future.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> Do you any additional info about the patches that you are referring
>> to? Did they make it into Xdmf repo, but just haven't made it into
>> ParaView yet?
>>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Chris Kees <cekees at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using XDMF for storing results of parallel unstructured finite
>>> element computations. I worked with some of the developers for the
>>> XDMF reader on getting proper display of the overlapping (ghost)
>>> entities a while back, but it doesn't seem like those changes were
>>> really merged into the trunk. Paraview 3.10 still doesn't appear to
>>> eliminate duplicate points and cells quite the way I would expect it
>>> to. Is there anybody still working on that functionality that could
>>> help me get some changes permanently made to paraview? I can supply
>>> data sets of various complexity (quad,tri,hex,tet, (bi-)quadratic,
>>> dynamic, etc) in a dropbox folder and am am willing to change the way
>>> we're organizing the information in XDMF (though if my memory serves,
>>> we had a patched paraview that worked fine with our current
>>> representation).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xdmf mailing list
>>> Xdmf at lists.kitware.com
>>> http://www.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xdmf
>>>
>>
>