[Paraview] Problem with LIC representation in PV3.10-RC1

[Adriano Gagliardi]

No, I opened a fresh version of ParaView, I navigated and selected the mesh
file and when I clicked apply, it crashed out with the
vtkSurfaceLICRepresentation error message:
 
ERROR: In /path/to/ParaView-3.10.0-RC1/Servers/Common/vtkProcessModule.cxx,
line 1095
vtkProcessModule (0x1047a150): Cannot create object of type
"vtkSurfaceLICRepresentation".
while processing
Message 0 = New
  Argument 0 = string_value {vtkSurfaceLICRepresentation}
  Argument 1 = id_value {326}

The irony is that, although I remember creating a vector before the crash,
at no point did I switch the representation to SurfaceLIC.

===================================

Adriano Gagliardi MEng PhD
Business Sector Leader
Computational Aerodynamics
Aircraft Research Association Ltd.
Manton Lane
Bedford

Tel: 01234 32 4644
E-mail: agagliardi at ara.co.uk
Url: www.ara.co.uk 
-----Original Message-----
From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com] 
Sent: 23 February 2011 14:49
To: agagliardi at ara.co.uk
Cc: paraview at paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Problem with LIC representation in PV3.10-RC1

Were you loading a state file or something? ParaView will never use
'SurfaceRepresentation" as the default representation.

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Adriano Gagliardi <agagliardi at ara.co.uk>
wrote:
>
>
> I just had a problem where I had my data loaded in and was visualising 
> it using Surface representation. During this, ParaView crashed with a 
> Floating Point Exception. However, when I restarted ParaView and I 
> tried to reload the dataset, it would just crash to desktop with an 
> error relating to vtkSurfaceLICRepresentation. It appears that it was 
> trying to display using the Surface LIC representation, but there are 
> no vectors contained within the dataset. I got round it by disabling 
> the SurfaceLIC plugin in the .ini file. It would be worth having an 
> option in the .ini file that allows you to specify a default
representation, or is there another way around this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Adriano
>
> ===================================
>
> Adriano Gagliardi MEng PhD
> Business Sector Leader
> Computational Aerodynamics
> Aircraft Research Association Ltd.
> Manton Lane
> Bedford
>
> Tel: 01234 32 4644
> E-mail: agagliardi at ara.co.uk
> Url: www.ara.co.uk
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email contains information that is private and confidential and is
intended only for the addressee.
> If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify us
immediately by e-mailing the sender.
> Note: All email sent to or from this address may be accessed by 
> someone other than the recipient, for system management and security
reasons.
> Aircraft Research Association Ltd.  Registered in England, Registration No
503668 Registered Office:
> Manton Lane, Bedford MK41 7PF England VAT No GB 196351245
>
> **********************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>


**********************************************************************
This email contains information that is private and confidential and is intended only for the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify us immediately by e-mailing the sender.
Note: All email sent to or from this address may be accessed by someone other than the recipient, for
system management and security reasons.
Aircraft Research Association Ltd.  Registered in England, Registration No 503668 Registered Office:
Manton Lane, Bedford MK41 7PF England VAT No GB 196351245

**********************************************************************