[Paraview] ParaView 3.10 RC1 Window Title Not Correct (OS X)
David Partyka
david.partyka at kitware.com
Mon Feb 7 14:29:05 EST 2011
It gets configured into CMake\branded_paraview_initializer.cxx.in as
BPC_TITLE. The configuration magic happens in ParaViewBranding.cmake. The
idea behind the branding code was to make creating generic paraview based
applications easy. I am hesitant about putting the ifdefs at the C++ level
as that would effect everyone using ParaView branded applications.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Michael Jackson <
mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
> I would have thought that some sort of header file would be created with
> all the preprocessor logic and then the actual Qt code would call out to
> that header file to get the correct QString to display in the title. Just
> having "Universal" in the header may or may not be good enough. I think I
> would really want to know in what mode (32 or 64 bit) it was truly running.
> Is that what is happening? I am having trouble following exactly where the
> "TITLE" argument to the build_paraview_client function is actually being
> used.
> ___________________________________________________________
> Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 12:04 PM, David Partyka wrote:
>
> > The bitness comes from ParaViewCommon.cmake around line 280 and passed
> into build_paraview_client in Applications/ParaView/CMakeLists.txt around
> line 49. I guess in this case the title should be Universal, what do you
> think? I have similar logic that generates the dmg name that way. i.e. if
> there are more than one target platforms then call it Darwub-Universal.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Michael Jackson <
> mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
> > Yes. I was doing a universal build targeted for 10.5 but using a 10.6 to
> build. Do you have a hint as to where that title is generated? I'll try and
> put together a patch.
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
> >
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:57 AM, David Partyka wrote:
> >
> > > Humm, curious if you doing a universal build then? Yeah please file a
> bug and I'll make sure it's fixed for 3.10.0 final.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Michael Jackson <
> mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
> > > Just compiled the latest ParaView from git (master) and when I launched
> the app I noticed at the top that it had "32 Bit" in the title. Just to
> verify my version was actually a 64 bit version. My guess is that when that
> title is generated in code there should be some preprocessor logic to figure
> out just how it was built. Relying on the sizeof(void*) probably isn't the
> best idea:
> > >
> > >
> > > #if !defined(__APPLE__)
> > > Compute title for NON Apple Platforms
> > > #else
> > > # if defined(__LP64__) && __LP64__
> > > 64 BIt title
> > > # else
> > > 32 bit title
> > > # endif
> > >
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > Should I put in a formal bug report?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > ___________________________________________________________
> > > Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
> > > Principal Software Engineer mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
> > > BlueQuartz Software Dayton, Ohio
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Powered by www.kitware.com
> > >
> > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> > >
> > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> > >
> > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20110207/822ce609/attachment.htm>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list