[Paraview] Xdmf on master branch

[David Partyka]

That should work. Ideally we can get packaging XDMF's python module working
properly for the next major release. I just created a bug for that task
here:

http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12445

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:

> I think making the option advanced makes sense. Dave, any objections?
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Tim Gallagher <tim.gallagher at gatech.edu>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just built off the master branch (commit 4f0d9672) and I noticed
> XDMF_WRAP_PYTHON was no longer an option.
> >
> > It appears it was set to INTERNAL in commit 7ac1f751, which was due to
> the conversation in the mailing list (
> http://markmail.org/message/gapnf4reuazdtfcn), although I'm not sure if it
> was made INTERNAL and ON prior to trying to release and just turned to OFF
> at last minute because of the problems.
> >
> > Is fixing the CPack issue high on the priority list so the binaries will
> ship with the XDMF python wrapper? If not, can we revert to the
> XDMF_WRAP_PYTHON option as advanced and not INTERNAL?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tim
> > _______________________________________________
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20110801/f1e286c0/attachment.htm>