[Paraview] new representations

[Paul Edwards]

Thanks again :)

On 15 July 2010 15:48, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:

> Not currently. However you can try to keep the copy-pasted code
> minimal by using a separate definition for your representation as done
> in  the example on wiki.
>
>
> http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/Plugin_HowTo#Adding_new_Representations_for_3D_View_using_Plugins__.2A_new_in_version_3.7
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Paul Edwards <paul.m.edwards at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I've just copied the Extension tag for each and it seems to work - is
> there
> > a better way than to Copy & Paste for each?
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
> >
> > On 15 July 2010 15:33, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> So you must have an <Extension > element for "GeometryRepresentation"
> >> in your plugin. You need to add <Extension > elements for
> >> "UniformGridRepresentation" and "UnstructuredGridRepresentation" as
> >> well.
> >>
> >> Utkarsh
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Paul Edwards <
> paul.m.edwards at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > The difference is due to
> >> > vtkSMRenderViewProxy::CreateDefaultRepresentation
> >> > returning either an UnstructuredGridRepresentation for unstructured
> >> > data,
> >> > UniformGridRepresentation for image data and GeometryRepresentation
> for
> >> > other datasets.  The representations from the plugins only appear with
> >> > the
> >> > GeometryRepresentation.  Do you know how to fix this?
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Paul
> >> >
> >> > On 15 July 2010 13:58, Paul Edwards <paul.m.edwards at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> By "added specifically for a type" I was referring to how ParaView
> adds
> >> >> a
> >> >> volume representation for unstructured dataset (and volume and slice
> >> >> for an
> >> >> image dataset).  I would like my representation to be available for
> all
> >> >> datasets.
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> Paul
> >> >>
> >> >> On 15 July 2010 13:54, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> What do you mean by "added specifically for a type". How are  you
> >> >>> doing
> >> >>> that?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Utkarsh
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Paul Edwards
> >> >>> <paul.m.edwards at gmail.com>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > Hi,
> >> >>> > I've added a representation to display feature edges but I can't
> get
> >> >>> > it
> >> >>> > to
> >> >>> > work for all datasets (it is missing for image and unstructured
> >> >>> > data).
> >> >>> >  It
> >> >>> > seems that when another representation is added specifically for a
> >> >>> > type
> >> >>> > of
> >> >>> > data set (e.g. volume for unstructured, or slice and volume for
> >> >>> > image
> >> >>> > data)
> >> >>> > it loses all the extra representations from plugins - unless I'm
> >> >>> > doing
> >> >>> > something wrong....  The same happens for the example
> representation
> >> >>> > plugin
> >> >>> > that comes with ParaView.  Any advice would be appreciated.
> >> >>> > Thanks,
> >> >>> > paul
> >> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >> >>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >> >>> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> >> >>> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >> >>> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20100715/5cc51f12/attachment.htm>