[Paraview] Plugins in Windows 3.6.2 binary
Marcus D. Hanwell
marcus.hanwell at kitware.com
Wed Jan 6 21:07:13 EST 2010
Hit send a second too soon, it should be,
if (MSVC)
# Do not generate manifests for the plugins - caused issues loading
plugins
set(CMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS "${CMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS} /MANIFEST:NO")
endif(MSVC)
In order to append to the module linker flags.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell <
marcus.hanwell at kitware.com> wrote:
> Something like,
>
> if (MSVC)
> # Do not generate manifests for the plugins - caused issues loading
> plugins
> set(CMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS "${CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS} /MANIFEST:NO")
> endif(MSVC)
>
> That was enough to fix the majority of the problems we saw with Qt plugins
> on Windows.
>
> Marcus
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Mike Jackson <mike.jackson at bluequartz.net>wrote:
>
>> For those of us following along at home. just what would that line in
>> the CMake file be?
>> _________________________________________________________
>> Mike Jackson mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell
>> <marcus.hanwell at kitware.com> wrote:
>> > I did this in the past and it seemed to work well. You can add a line to
>> the
>> > CMakeLists file to instruct CMake not to do this.
>> >
>> > On Wednesday 06 January 2010 18:06:01 Dave Partyka wrote:
>> >> So you're saying that if I don't embed any manifest (which the IDE does
>> by
>> >> default) into the plugins it should just work?
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Clinton Stimpson
>> > <clinton at elemtech.com>wrote:
>> >> > Can you fix that issue some people might have by not embedding the
>> >> > manifests
>> >> > into the plugin dlls, where embedding them is the default behavior?
>> >> >
>> >> > Clint
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wednesday 06 January 2010 03:58:54 pm Dave Partyka wrote:
>> >> > > Hi All,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I have tracked down the issue. That being an inconspicuous Visual
>> >> > > Studio Security update
>> >> > > (KB971092<
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/info.aspx?na=49&p=1&SrcDisplay
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >Lang=en&SrcCategoryId=&SrcFamilyId=294de390-3c94-49fb-a014-9a38580e64cb&
>> >> > >u=ht tp%3a%2f%2fsupport.microsoft.com%2f%3fkbid%3d971092> ) that
>> was
>> >> > > installed sometime after I did the 3.6.1 release. Binaries built
>> with
>> >> > > that patch applied appear to not run on older revisions of XP
>> (SP2).
>> >> > > Thus, I have uninstalled the update, rebuilt ParaView 3.6.2 and
>> >> > > uploaded the
>> >> >
>> >> > regenerated
>> >> >
>> >> > > binary to the download server. I have verified that it does work on
>> a
>> >> >
>> >> > clean
>> >> >
>> >> > > SP2 machine BUT you must either install the Visual Studio runtime
>> >> > > redistributable (simple)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A5C84275-3B97-4A
>> >> >B7
>> >> >
>> >> > >-A40D-3802B2AF5FC2&displaylang=en
>> >> > >
>> >> > > OR copy the runtime dlls (Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest, msvcm90.dll
>> >> > > msvcp90.dll msvcr90.dll) distributed with ParaView into each
>> plugin's
>> >> > > folder (ugly) in order to get plugins to work.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Any one using an up-to-date Windows XP or newer (Vista,7) should be
>> >> > > able to disregard these directions.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Please report and further issues relating to this and thank you for
>> the
>> >> > > feedback!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Robert Maynard
>> >> >
>> >> > <robertjmaynard at gmail.com>wrote:
>> >> > > > When you profile ParaView does the main executable and plugins
>> load
>> >> >
>> >> > the
>> >> >
>> >> > > > same MSVC dlls. ( F9 shows full paths of loaded dlls ).
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > If they don't load the same dlls, comparing the manifest files
>> will
>> >> > > > determine if the problem is two different versions of the MSVC
>> are
>> >> >
>> >> > being
>> >> >
>> >> > > > used.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Um, sure. What specifically would you like me to report?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > -Ken
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On 1/5/10 4:46 PM, "Robert Maynard" <RobertJMaynard at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Would you be able to run dependency walker, and report back the
>> >> >
>> >> > results?
>> >> >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <
>> kmorel at sandia.gov>
>> >> > > > wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > I tried adding the runtime redistributable. The plugins now load
>> >> >
>> >> > without
>> >> >
>> >> > > > complaint, but they do not work. The SLAC tools plugin does not
>> >> > > > create
>> >> >
>> >> > a
>> >> >
>> >> > > > toolbar like it is supposed to. The point sprite plugin does not
>> >> >
>> >> > create
>> >> >
>> >> > > > the “Point Sprite” representation to the representation combo
>> box.
>> >> > > > The VisIt reader plugin allows you to open .silo files, but they
>> >> > > > always end up with empty data.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Does anyone have an idea why that is? Could it be using two
>> >> > > > different sets of MSVC libraries?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > -Ken
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On 1/5/10 3:11 PM, "Dave Partyka" <dave.partyka at kitware.com <
>> >> > > > http://dave.partyka@kitware.com> > wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > The best you can probably do if you're stuck at SP2 is install
>> the
>> >> > > > runtime redistributable.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A5C84275-3B97-4A
>> >> >
>> >> > > >B7-A40D-3802B2AF5FC2&displaylang=en
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <
>> kmorel at sandia.gov
>> >> > > > < http://kmorel@sandia.gov> > wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Given that, is there some advice you can give for installing the
>> MSVC
>> >> > > > classes on Windows XP stuck at SP 2? How do you do that (without
>> >> > > > installing the entire compiler)?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > -Ken
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On 1/5/10 1:45 PM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" <
>> utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com <
>> >> > > > http://utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com> <http://utkarsh.ayachit@
>> >> >
>> >> > kitware.com>
>> >> >
>> >> > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > Another option would
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > be for ParaView to do a silent install of the MSVC redist
>> package
>> >> > > > > instead
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > of
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > dumping the dll's/
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Actually that might not be a bad idea. We can even make it a
>> option
>> >> > > > that the user can uncheck, if he wants. Maybe we should look into
>> >> > > > that for 3.8.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Utkarsh
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > **** Kenneth Moreland
>> >> > > > *** Sandia National Laboratories
>> >> > > > ***********
>> >> > > > *** *** *** email: kmorel at sandia.gov <http://kmorel@sandia.gov>
>> <
>> >> > > > http://kmorel@sandia.gov>
>> >> > > > ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919
>> >> > > > *** web:
>> >> > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel><
>> >> > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel>
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > **** Kenneth Moreland
>> >> > > > *** Sandia National Laboratories
>> >> > > > ***********
>> >> > > > *** *** *** email: kmorel at sandia.gov <http://kmorel@sandia.gov>
>> >> > > > ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919
>> >> > > > *** web:
>> >> > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel><
>> >> > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel>
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > **** Kenneth Moreland
>> >> > > > *** Sandia National Laboratories
>> >> > > > ***********
>> >> > > > *** *** *** email: kmorel at sandia.gov
>> >> > > > ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919
>> >> > > > *** web:
>> >> > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel>
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> >> > > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> >> > > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> >> > > > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Marcus D. Hanwell, Ph.D.
>> > R&D Engineer, Kitware Inc.
>> > (518) 881-4937
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >
>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >
>> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>> >
>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Marcus D. Hanwell, Ph.D.
> R&D Engineer, Kitware Inc.
> (518) 881-4937
>
--
Marcus D. Hanwell, Ph.D.
R&D Engineer, Kitware Inc.
(518) 881-4937
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20100106/9a64523f/attachment.htm>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list