[Paraview] Plugins in Windows 3.6.2 binary

[Clinton Stimpson]

Can you fix that issue some people might have by not embedding the manifests 
into the plugin dlls, where embedding them is the default behavior?

Clint

On Wednesday 06 January 2010 03:58:54 pm Dave Partyka wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have tracked down the issue. That being an inconspicuous Visual Studio
> Security update
> (KB971092<http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/info.aspx?na=49&p=1&SrcDisplay
>Lang=en&SrcCategoryId=&SrcFamilyId=294de390-3c94-49fb-a014-9a38580e64cb&u=ht
>tp%3a%2f%2fsupport.microsoft.com%2f%3fkbid%3d971092> ) that was installed
> sometime after I did the 3.6.1 release. Binaries built with that patch
> applied appear to not run on older revisions of XP (SP2). Thus, I have
> uninstalled the update, rebuilt ParaView 3.6.2 and uploaded the regenerated
> binary to the download server. I have verified that it does work on a clean
> SP2 machine BUT you must either install the Visual Studio runtime
> redistributable (simple)
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A5C84275-3B97-4AB7
>-A40D-3802B2AF5FC2&displaylang=en
>
> OR copy the runtime dlls (Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest, msvcm90.dll
> msvcp90.dll msvcr90.dll) distributed with ParaView into each plugin's
> folder (ugly) in order to get plugins to work.
>
> Any one using an up-to-date Windows XP or newer (Vista,7) should be able
> to disregard these directions.
>
>
> Please report and further issues relating to this and thank you for the
> feedback!
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Robert Maynard 
<robertjmaynard at gmail.com>wrote:
> >  When you profile ParaView does the main executable and plugins load the
> > same MSVC dlls. ( F9 shows full paths of loaded dlls ).
> >
> > If they don't load the same dlls, comparing the manifest files will
> > determine if the problem is two different versions of the MSVC are being
> > used.
> >
> >
> > Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
> >
> > Um, sure.  What specifically would you like me to report?
> >
> > -Ken
> >
> >
> > On 1/5/10 4:46 PM, "Robert Maynard" <RobertJMaynard at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  Would you be able to run dependency walker, and report back the results?
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <kmorel at sandia.gov>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I tried adding the runtime redistributable.  The plugins now load without
> > complaint, but they do not work.  The SLAC tools plugin does not create a
> > toolbar like it is supposed to.  The point sprite plugin does not create
> > the “Point Sprite” representation to the representation combo box.  The
> > VisIt reader plugin allows you to open .silo files, but they always end
> > up with empty data.
> >
> > Does anyone have an idea why that is?  Could it be using two different
> > sets of MSVC libraries?
> >
> > -Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/5/10 3:11 PM, "Dave Partyka" <dave.partyka at kitware.com <
> > http://dave.partyka@kitware.com> > wrote:
> >
> >  The best you can probably do if you're stuck at SP2 is install the
> > runtime redistributable.
> >
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A5C84275-3B97-4A
> >B7-A40D-3802B2AF5FC2&displaylang=en
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <kmorel at sandia.gov <
> > http://kmorel@sandia.gov> > wrote:
> >
> > Given that, is there some advice you can give for installing the MSVC
> > classes on Windows XP stuck at SP 2?  How do you do that (without
> > installing the entire compiler)?
> >
> > -Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/5/10 1:45 PM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com <
> > http://utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com>  <http://utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com>
> >
> > > wrote:
> >  > Another option would
> > >
> > > be for ParaView to do a silent install of the MSVC redist package
> > > instead
> >
> > of
> >
> > > dumping the dll's/
> >
> > Actually that might not be a bad idea. We can even make it a option
> > that the user can uncheck, if he wants. Maybe we should look into that
> > for 3.8.
> >
> > Utkarsh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    ****      Kenneth Moreland
> >     ***      Sandia National Laboratories
> > ***********
> > *** *** ***  email: kmorel at sandia.gov <http://kmorel@sandia.gov>  <
> > http://kmorel@sandia.gov>
> > **  ***  **  phone: (505) 844-8919
> >     ***      web:  
> > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel><
> > http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    ****      Kenneth Moreland
> >     ***      Sandia National Laboratories
> > ***********
> > *** *** ***  email: kmorel at sandia.gov <http://kmorel@sandia.gov>
> > **  ***  **  phone: (505) 844-8919
> >     ***      web:  
> > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel><
> > http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    ****      Kenneth Moreland
> >     ***      Sandia National Laboratories
> > ***********
> > *** *** ***  email: kmorel at sandia.gov
> > **  ***  **  phone: (505) 844-8919
> >     ***      web:  
> > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview