[Paraview] Moving slice with particle

Thorsten Hater th at tp1.rub.de
Fri Feb 19 10:12:46 EST 2010


Thanks for this! But contrary to my earlier optimism it seems not so 
easy to
use a slice filter in a programmable filter (I played mostly with the 
pvpython
  up to this point)
The python vtk module does not export ExtractVOI or ImageSlice filter,
the generic cutter does not work for me.
If I import paraview.simple a new connection pops up and PV itself is 
messed up,
so I can't use simple's Slice. Can I work around this behaviour?


Am 19.02.2010 01:42, schrieb Berk Geveci:
> self.GetInputDataObject(0, n)
>
> should return the nth input.
>
> -berk
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Thorsten Hater <th at tp1.rub.de 
> <mailto:th at tp1.rub.de>> wrote:
>
>     Most of building blocks I was able to figure out, but how do
>     I retrieve the second input from the servermanager?
>
>     Berk Geveci wrote:
>     > It is definitely doable with the programmable filter although not as
>     > trivial as it would be with a tool like VisTrails. The programmable
>     > filter can accept multiple inputs. You could use the point from
>     on of
>     > its inputs to setup the parameter of an internal slice filter -
>     which
>     > requires importing the vtk.graphics module. If you can't figure it
>     > out, let me know, I'll help.
>     >
>     > -berk
>     >
>     > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Thorsten Hater <th at tp1.rub.de
>     <mailto:th at tp1.rub.de>
>     > <mailto:th at tp1.rub.de <mailto:th at tp1.rub.de>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hello,
>     >
>     >     I have encountered the following problem in a set of animations:
>     >     There is a moving particle in a field and I want to slice
>     the field
>     >     at the particle's position (effectively the y-component of the
>     >     position).
>     >     Additionally the slice should move automatically with the
>     particle
>     >     for making an animation.
>     >     Has anybody done something like this before?
>     >     The programmable filter seems a good point to start, but I need
>     >     at least two inputs for figuring out the offset.
>     >     Thanks in advance for any pointers or help!
>     >
>     >     Cheers,
>     >       Thorsten
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     Thorsten Hater
>     >     Institut fuer Theoretische Physik I
>     >     Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum
>     >     E-Mail: tp1 at tp1.rub.de <mailto:tp1 at tp1.rub.de>
>     <mailto:tp1 at tp1.rub.de <mailto:tp1 at tp1.rub.de>>
>     >     Tel.: 0234/32-23-441
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>     <http://www.kitware.com>
>     >
>     >     Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>     > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>     >
>     >     Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>     > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>     >
>     >     Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>     > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>     >
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
>     Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>     http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
>     Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>     http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
>     Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>     http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>


-- 
Thorsten Hater
Institut fuer Theoretische Physik I
Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum
E-Mail: tp1 at tp1.rub.de
Tel.: 0234/32-23-441

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20100219/745e7603/attachment.htm>


More information about the ParaView mailing list