[Paraview] PV 3.8 RC1 + Cmake 2.8.1 failing?

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

That's good news :). At least the dependency issue is solved. Dave
will shortly commit a fix for not over-ridding the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
when running SMExtractDocumentation.

Utkarsh

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Sven Buijssen
<sven.buijssen at tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
> Hi Utkarsh,
>
> The patch works partially. Both sequential and parallel builds are
> possible now, but only when not compiling against Mesa (and using
> VTK_USE_RPATH:BOOL=OFF).
> If one does, creating the help file fails, even though the mesa lib
> directory is part of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH:
>
>> /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /data/ParaView3_Git_Build_SLES10_SP2/CMakeFiles
>> [ 99%] Creating Documentation for ParaViewSources
>> cd /data/ParaView3_Git_Build_SLES10_SP2/Servers/ServerManager && /usr/bin/cmake -DfullXMLFile=/data/ParaView3_Git/Applications/ParaView/ParaViewSources.xml -P /data/ParaView3_Git_Build_SLES10_SP2/CMake/ExecuteSMExtractDocumentation.cmake
>> /data/ParaView3_Git_Build_SLES10_SP2/bin/vtkSMExtractDocumentation-real: error while loading shared libraries: libOSMesa.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>> /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /data/ParaView3_Git_Build_SLES10_SP2/CMakeFiles
>> [ 99%] Creating Documentation for ParaViewFilters
>> cd /data/ParaView3_Git_Build_SLES10_SP2/Servers/ServerManager && /usr/bin/cmake -DfullXMLFile=/data/ParaView3_Git/Applications/ParaView/ParaViewFilters.xml -P /data/ParaView3_Git_Build_SLES10_SP2/CMake/ExecuteSMExtractDocumentation.cmake
>> /data/ParaView3_Git_Build_SLES10_SP2/bin/vtkSMExtractDocumentation-real: error while loading shared libraries: libOSMesa.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> Sven
>
>
>
> Utkarsh Ayachit wrote, On 20.04.2010 17:02:
>> Sven,
>>
>> Attached is a patch that may resolve this issue. Can you give it a try?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Sven Buijssen
>> <sven.buijssen at tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>>> Sven Buijssen wrote:
>>>>> (off the list for the moment while discussing some technical details)
>>>>>
>>>> [taking back to the list]
>>>>> I managed to compile PV 3.8 RC1
>>>>> (http://www.paraview.org/files/v3.8/ParaView-3.8.0-RC1.tar.gz) on a
>>>>> 32bit openSuSE 11.1 system, with any of cmake 2.6.4, 2.8.0 and 2.8.1.
>>>>> Here's my recipe:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> % make -j 16
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ouch, just for fun I tried to use make -j 2 instead of a single process
>>>> make and the problem went away, i.e. the compile succeeded. That's not
>>>> very good...
>>>> Out of interest, do you always build multi-process? I'm on a dual-core
>>>> machine and when building in the background make -j N isn't very
>>>> attractive.
>>>
>>> Yes, I usually build with N > 1.
>>> I just tested your hypothesis and I can confirm that (for a clean build)
>>> it does make a difference whether one compiles with 1 or more processes.
>>> The error > make[2]: *** No rule to make target
>>> `Applications/ParaView/../../Documentation/paraview.qch', needed by
>>> `Applications/ParaView/qrc_paraview_help.cxx'.  Stop.
>>> does only occur when compiling sequentially (on 32 bit Linux). Funny to
>>> see that on my 3 different 64 bit Linux operating systems compilation
>>> always fails at this point, even with N > 1.
>>>
>>> Sven
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>
>