[Paraview] Ridiculously slow D3 (a bug in vtkMergeCells)
Takuya OSHIMA
oshima at eng.niigata-u.ac.jp
Thu Oct 1 10:09:07 EDT 2009
Guys, thanks for all the responses, the tracker entry and applying the
patch.
I'm afraid I'm not sure if I can provide a good test dataset since the
bug does not affect small cases (the point insertion should take
O(n^2) of time where n is the number of points, when the hasing is not
working) and relies on indeterminate values (there's always a
possibility that the problem doesn't reproduce), which is why I did
all the tracking down by myself. But I'll see if I can do something.
Takuya
Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
From: Zhanping Liu <zhanping.liu at kitware.com>
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Ridiculously slow D3 (a bug in vtkMergeCells)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:39:15 -0400
> *
> Takuya:
>
> The problem was reflected on Mantis (issue #009626) and the suggested fix
> was applied. If you have any test (and shareable datasets), please feel free
> to submit it via Mantis.
>
> Thanks for the report and the fix.
>
> -Zhanping
> --
> Zhanping Liu, PhD
> Kitware, Inc.
> 28 Corporate Drive
> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
> Phone: 518-371-3971 x 138
> http://www.zhanpingliu.org
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Takuya OSHIMA <oshima at eng.niigata-u.ac.jp>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have had a problem of ridiculously slow D3 of PV 3.6.1/3.7-cvs under
> some conditions. Most of the time the problem occurs when I have more
> pvserver processes than the number of data pieces, in which case D3
> takes two orders of magnitude more time than usual, despite that the
> resulting repartitioned dataset looks fine.
>
> Attaching a performance analyzer (Apple's Shark) to the pvserver
> processes revealed that, in one of the pvserver processes
> vtkMergePoints::InsertUniquePoint() took up virtually all of the
> processor time, as attached sharkOutput.jpg.
>
> It further turned out that this is because the instance of
> vtkMergePoints is given indeterminate bounds by its caller
> vtkMergeCells::MapPointsToIdsUsingLocator() and hence hashing based on
> relative point coordinates in the bounds is not working. Here is a
> proposed fix to the problem (the comment "points0->GetNumberOfPoints()
> is equal to..." was taken from about 50 lines below the patched lines
> in the same function. I believe it explains everything.).
>
> Index: vtkMergeCells.cxx
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/ParaView3/ParaView3/VTK/Graphics/vtkMergeCells.cxx,v
> retrieving revision 1.9
> diff -u -r1.9 vtkMergeCells.cxx
> --- vtkMergeCells.cxx 23 Jan 2009 03:25:07 -0000 1.9
> +++ vtkMergeCells.cxx 30 Sep 2009 06:47:09 -0000
> @@ -723,7 +723,12 @@
> if (npoints0 > 0)
> {
> double tmpbounds[6];
> + // points0->GetNumberOfPoints() is equal to the upper bound
> + // on the points in the final merged grid. We need to temporarily
> + // set it to the number of points added to the merged grid so far.
> + points0->GetData()->SetNumberOfTuples(npoints0);
> grid->GetBounds(tmpbounds);
> + points0->GetData()->SetNumberOfTuples(this->TotalNumberOfPoints);
>
> bounds[0] = ((tmpbounds[0] < bounds[0]) ? tmpbounds[0] : bounds[0]);
> bounds[2] = ((tmpbounds[2] < bounds[2]) ? tmpbounds[2] : bounds[2]);
>
> Regards,
> Takuya
>
> Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
> Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://
> paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list