[Paraview] 64Bit Experiment
Michael Jackson
mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
Wed Mar 4 10:56:30 EST 2009
Um.. well I just put in a bug report the removes the Carbon framework
from linker flags in the FindQt4.cmake file. Wonder if that was really
necessary. I just assumed that if I want a true 64 bit build then
Carbon would hold me back on that.
I guess, how do we know if we get a true 64bit build of Qt4.5 and
ParaView then? I guess if the compile succeeds that is the first step.
I don't actually have a 64 bit machine (yet) but hopefully by the end
of the month I'll have one of those swanky Core i7 Xeons that just got
release on tuesday.
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
www.bluequartz.net
On Mar 4, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Sean McBride wrote:
> On 3/4/09 8:49 AM, Clinton Stimpson said:
>
>>> Thanks, I'll try to take a look at it.
>>>
>>> Also reported issue http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8671
>>> against the FindQt4.cmake file. Patch is attached to the bug.
>>>
>>> Synopsis: The Carbon framework is being added to the link line
>>> when it
>>> should not when Qt4.5 built with Cocoa is found.
>>
>> I didn't change that because qmake still adds the -framework Carbon
>> compile flag for a Cocoa based Qt. At least that's what I saw in the
>> beta and rc1.
>> I'm not sure why it still does.
>
> Not all of Carbon.framework is deprecated, and much of it is available
> in 64 bit too. Maybe they need parts of it even for their Cocoa
> version?
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________________
> Sean McBride, B. Eng sean at rogue-research.com
> Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
> Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
>
>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list