[Paraview] cpack not adapted yet to branding commit?

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Sven,

If I remember correctly, in my emails I did mention that the
installation rules are broken and they will be fixed soon (~ 1 month).
We are planning on a general cleanup and restructuring of the install
rules to make sure it packages are generated correctly on all
platforms.

Utkarsh

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Sven Buijssen
<sven.buijssen at tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that since Utkarsh branding commit the tar/rpm-packages created by
> means of 'make package'/'cpack -G TGZ'/... at the end of a nightly automatic
> build are considerably smaller, 30-50% depending on the architecture. In
> particular, they do not contain a paraview binary any more, but in the bin
> subdirectory merely:
>
> bin/lproj
> bin/pvbatch
> bin/pvdataserver
> bin/pvpython
> bin/pvrenderserver
> bin/pvserver
> bin/smTestDriver
>
> Happens with cmake 2.6.4 and 2.8.0 on 6 different Unix platforms.
>
> ParaView itself builds just fine on these platforms (by now), it's just that the
> packaging mechanism seems to be broken. Given that Utkarsh's pre- and
> post-branding commit mails on the developer mailing list nor the pdf attachment
> listing the internal document
> http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/index.php/ParaView-based_Applications mentions
> changes in the cpack mechanism, can anyone confirm my observation?
>
> Sven
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>