[Paraview] Fedora mpi packaging

[clinton at elemtech.com]

However, separating the packages would allow a paraview server to be installed 
on a machine without a bunch of extra prerequisites (I'm not sure how many 
that would be).

Clint

On Thursday 26 June 2008 12:13:11 pm Kent Eschenberg wrote:
> I don't think so. The "client" package would only contain one binary,
> "paraview", which is also the standalone binary.
>
> Kent
>
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Kent Eschenberg wrote:
> >> Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>> My current question is what binaries need mpi versions? ...
> >>> But I'm guessing you could use a non-mpi "paraview" binary to connect
> >>> to  a parallel running pvserver just fine ...
> >>
> >> Yes. I don't think the mpi version of "paraview" actually uses mpi.
> >> You definitely need the mpi version of pvbatch and pvserver; I don't
> >> know about the others.
> >>
> >> Kent
> >> Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
> >
> > Follow up -
> >
> >  Would it make sense to have "client" and "server" packages?  If so,
> > what would go where?
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
> ParaView mailing list
> ParaView at paraview.org
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview